George C. Kramer

7.8k total citations
207 papers, 5.2k citations indexed

About

George C. Kramer is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, George C. Kramer has authored 207 papers receiving a total of 5.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 88 papers in Emergency Medicine, 59 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 54 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in George C. Kramer's work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (80 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (51 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (45 papers). George C. Kramer is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (80 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (51 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (45 papers). George C. Kramer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Sweden. George C. Kramer's co-authors include James W. Holcroft, James J. Grady, Charles E. Wade, David N. Herndon, Paul R. Perron, Donald S. Prough, Bruce A. Harms, Michael P. Kinsky, Riad Naim Younes and Michael A. Dubick and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

George C. Kramer

196 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
George C. Kramer United States 41 2.2k 1.9k 1.4k 1.4k 876 207 5.2k
Lauralyn McIntyre Canada 43 884 0.4× 1.5k 0.8× 1.8k 1.3× 1.3k 1.0× 689 0.8× 156 7.2k
Jay L. Falk United States 29 1.9k 0.9× 760 0.4× 1.2k 0.8× 1.3k 0.9× 692 0.8× 54 4.2k
Jacques Créteur Belgium 39 1.6k 0.7× 2.3k 1.2× 2.9k 2.1× 3.4k 2.5× 1.4k 1.6× 223 7.7k
Pär I. Johansson Denmark 58 3.9k 1.8× 6.4k 3.3× 2.5k 1.7× 2.0k 1.5× 1.3k 1.4× 297 10.8k
Jacques Duranteau France 53 3.7k 1.7× 4.2k 2.2× 3.7k 2.6× 2.0k 1.5× 1.7k 2.0× 230 11.1k
Frans Bruyninckx Belgium 18 691 0.3× 1.7k 0.9× 1.6k 1.1× 2.4k 1.7× 853 1.0× 50 8.8k
John H. Siegel United States 44 1.5k 0.7× 611 0.3× 1.7k 1.2× 1.2k 0.9× 259 0.3× 146 5.4k
Jyrki Tenhunen Finland 35 1.1k 0.5× 984 0.5× 949 0.7× 1.6k 1.1× 332 0.4× 109 4.3k
Marc‐Jacques Dubois Belgium 19 607 0.3× 1.8k 0.9× 1.6k 1.1× 2.1k 1.5× 419 0.5× 26 4.4k
Jasper van Bommel Netherlands 36 716 0.3× 950 0.5× 1.9k 1.3× 1.5k 1.1× 363 0.4× 126 4.1k

Countries citing papers authored by George C. Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George C. Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George C. Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George C. Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George C. Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George C. Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George C. Kramer. The network helps show where George C. Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George C. Kramer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George C. Kramer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George C. Kramer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George C. Kramer. George C. Kramer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sampson, Catherine, Syed Ahmar Shah, Michael P. Kinsky, et al.. (2025). Comparative Assessment of In Vivo and In Silico Evaluation of Automated Fluid Resuscitation Controllers. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 54(3). 857–868.
2.
Sampson, Catherine, Michael P. Kinsky, George C. Kramer, et al.. (2024). A Lumped-Parameter Model of the Cardiovascular System Response for Evaluating Automated Fluid Resuscitation Systems. IEEE Access. 12. 62511–62525. 3 indexed citations
3.
Kramer, George C., et al.. (2024). A mathematical model for simulation of cardiovascular, renal, and hormonal responses to burn injury and resuscitation. Frontiers in Physiology. 15. 1467351–1467351. 1 indexed citations
4.
Sampson, Catherine, John R. Salsbury, Ramin Bighamian, et al.. (2022). A Mathematical Model for Simulation of Vasoplegic Shock and Vasopressor Therapy. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 70(5). 1565–1574. 7 indexed citations
5.
Kramer, George C., et al.. (2021). Mathematical Modeling, In-Human Evaluation and Analysis of Volume Kinetics and Kidney Function After Burn Injury and Resuscitation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 69(1). 366–376. 6 indexed citations
6.
Kramer, George C., et al.. (2021). Collective Variational Inference for Personalized and Generative Physiological Modeling: A Case Study on Hemorrhage Resuscitation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 69(2). 666–677. 15 indexed citations
7.
Bighamian, Ramin, et al.. (2018). Control-oriented physiological modeling of hemodynamic responses to blood volume perturbation. Control Engineering Practice. 73(April 2018). 149–160. 29 indexed citations
9.
Kramer, George C., et al.. (2016). Inaccuracy of Urine Output Measurements due to Urinary Retention in Catheterized Patients in the Burn ICU. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 38(1). e409–e417. 10 indexed citations
10.
Kramer, George C., et al.. (2015). Trending, Accuracy, and Precision of Noninvasive Hemoglobin Monitoring During Human Hemorrhage and Fixed Crystalloid Bolus. Shock. 44(Supplement 1). 45–49. 15 indexed citations
11.
Saad, Antonio F., et al.. (2015). 71. Critical Care Medicine. 43. 19–19.
12.
Howard, Taylor S., et al.. (2012). Burn-Induced Cardiac Dysfunction Increases Length of Stay in Pediatric Burn Patients. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 34(4). 413–419. 22 indexed citations
13.
Hoskins, Stephen L., et al.. (2011). Pharmacokinetics of intraosseous and central venous drug delivery during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 83(1). 107–112. 75 indexed citations
14.
Hoskins, Stephen L., et al.. (2006). Abstract 79: Efficacy of Epinephrine Delivery via the Intraosseous Humeral Head Route during CPR. Circulation. 114. 4 indexed citations
15.
Miller, Larry J., et al.. (2005). Rescue access made easy.. PubMed. 30(10). suppl 8–18; quiz suppl 19. 23 indexed citations
16.
Ying, Hao, et al.. (2002). Closed-loop fuzzy control of resuscitation of hemorrhagic shock in sheep. 1575–1576 vol.2. 8 indexed citations
17.
Hahn, Robert G., George C. Kramer, Donald S. Prough, & Stein Tølløfsrud. (2002). Physiological or Functional Fluid Spaces [2] (muliple letters). Anesthesia & Analgesia. 95(1). 251–252. 2 indexed citations
18.
Figueiredo, Luiz Francisco Poli de, Sharon H. Nelson, M. Mathru, Maurício Rocha e Silva, & George C. Kramer. (2001). Effects of Hemoglobin‐Based Blood Substitutes on Vasoactivity of Rat Aortic Rings. Artificial Organs. 25(11). 928–933. 7 indexed citations
19.
Elgjo, G. I., Babu P. Mathew, Luiz Francisco Poli de Figueiredo, et al.. (1998). RESUSCITATION WITH HYPERTONIC SALINE DEXTRAN IMPROVES CARDIAC FUNCTION IN VIVO AND EX VIVO AFTER BURN INJURY IN SHEEP. Shock. 9(5). 375–383. 26 indexed citations
20.
Kramer, George C., Carroll E. Cross, D. N. Herndon, & D. L. Traber. (1984). Distribution of bronchial blood flow in unanesthetized sheep measured with a double microsphere technique. Federation Proceedings. 43(4). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026