Geoffrey Ower

457 total citations
18 papers, 267 citations indexed

About

Geoffrey Ower is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, Geoffrey Ower has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 267 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 8 papers in Genetics and 6 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in Geoffrey Ower's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers) and Plant and animal studies (6 papers). Geoffrey Ower is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (8 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (6 papers) and Plant and animal studies (6 papers). Geoffrey Ower collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Geoffrey Ower's co-authors include R. Edward DeWalt, Steven A. Juliano, Scott K. Sakaluk, John Hunt, Sandra Steiger, Christopher Mitchell, Carie B. Weddle, Christopher G. Hamaker, Susan N. Gershman and Laura A. Vogel and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology Letters, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and PLoS neglected tropical diseases.

In The Last Decade

Geoffrey Ower

16 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Geoffrey Ower United States 9 151 107 92 67 33 18 267
Luiz Carlos Pinho Brazil 10 148 1.0× 51 0.5× 174 1.9× 44 0.7× 44 1.3× 56 279
Kimberly M. Ballare United States 10 115 0.8× 90 0.8× 65 0.7× 77 1.1× 36 1.1× 14 224
Edward Deveson Australia 7 103 0.7× 90 0.8× 97 1.1× 64 1.0× 72 2.2× 13 236
Freddy Bravo Brazil 9 352 2.3× 133 1.2× 53 0.6× 55 0.8× 16 0.5× 105 429
Gordon M. Nishida United States 9 168 1.1× 84 0.8× 95 1.0× 120 1.8× 43 1.3× 13 281
Antoine Foucart France 12 165 1.1× 133 1.2× 89 1.0× 89 1.3× 95 2.9× 37 335
Magdi S. El-Hawagry Egypt 11 309 2.0× 132 1.2× 51 0.6× 207 3.1× 33 1.0× 50 388
Emma V. Ridley United Kingdom 3 70 0.5× 66 0.6× 42 0.5× 235 3.5× 23 0.7× 3 351
Jasmina Ludoški Serbia 14 212 1.4× 125 1.2× 81 0.9× 204 3.0× 40 1.2× 34 395
Lorena Ruíz-Montoya Mexico 10 126 0.8× 44 0.4× 81 0.9× 165 2.5× 54 1.6× 54 298

Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey Ower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey Ower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey Ower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey Ower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey Ower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey Ower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey Ower. The network helps show where Geoffrey Ower may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoffrey Ower

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoffrey Ower. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoffrey Ower based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoffrey Ower. Geoffrey Ower is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Bánki, Olaf, et al.. (2023). Towards a Quality Assurance and Quality Control Mechanism for Species List Building. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards. 7. 3 indexed citations
2.
Juliano, Steven A., et al.. (2022). Predation in Many Dimensions: Spatial Context Is Important for Meaningful Functional Response Experiments. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 10. 8 indexed citations
3.
Ower, Geoffrey. (2022). Not a programmer? You can mobilize data from biodiversity informatics APIs, too!. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards. 6.
4.
Ramírez, José L., et al.. (2021). Impacts of fungal entomopathogens on survival and immune responses of Aedes albopictus and Culex pipiens mosquitoes in the context of native Wolbachia infections. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 15(11). e0009984–e0009984. 16 indexed citations
5.
Ower, Geoffrey & Dmitry Mozzherin. (2021). Algorithms for connecting scientific names with literature in the Biodiversity Heritage Library via the Global Names Project and Catalogue of Life. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 5. 1 indexed citations
6.
Juliano, Steven A., Katie M. Westby, & Geoffrey Ower. (2019). Know Your Enemy: Effects of a Predator on Native and Invasive Container Mosquitoes. Journal of Medical Entomology. 56(2). 320–328. 11 indexed citations
7.
Ower, Geoffrey & Steven A. Juliano. (2019). The demographic and life‐history costs of fear: Trait‐mediated effects of threat of predation onAedes triseriatus. Ecology and Evolution. 9(7). 3794–3806. 9 indexed citations
8.
Ower, Geoffrey, et al.. (2019). The Catalogue of Life: Assembling data into a global taxonomic checklist. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards. 3. 2 indexed citations
9.
DeWalt, R. Edward & Geoffrey Ower. (2019). Ecosystem Services, Global Diversity, and Rate of Stonefly Species Descriptions (Insecta: Plecoptera). Insects. 10(4). 99–99. 64 indexed citations
10.
Döring, Markus & Geoffrey Ower. (2019). The Catalogue of Life Data Package - A new format for exchanging nomenclatural and taxonomic information. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards. 3. 3 indexed citations
11.
DeWalt, R. Edward, et al.. (2018). Wet collections accession: a workflow based on a large stonefly (Insecta, Plecoptera) donation. Biodiversity Data Journal. 6(6). e30256–e30256. 7 indexed citations
12.
Ower, Geoffrey & Steven A. Juliano. (2018). Effects of larval density on a natural population of Culex restuans (Diptera: Culicidae): no evidence of compensatory mortality. Ecological Entomology. 44(2). 197–205. 11 indexed citations
13.
Ower, Geoffrey, John Hunt, & Scott K. Sakaluk. (2016). Multivariate sexual selection on male tegmina in wild populations of sagebrush crickets, Cyphoderris strepitans (Orthoptera: Haglidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 30(2). 338–351. 5 indexed citations
14.
Steiger, Sandra, Geoffrey Ower, Johannes Stökl, et al.. (2013). Sexual selection on cuticular hydrocarbons of male sagebrush crickets in the wild. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 280(1773). 20132353–20132353. 31 indexed citations
15.
Ower, Geoffrey, Kevin A. Judge, Sandra Steiger, et al.. (2013). Multivariate sexual selection on male song structure in wild populations of sagebrush crickets, Cyphoderris strepitans (Orthoptera: Haglidae). Ecology and Evolution. 3(10). 3590–3603. 15 indexed citations
16.
Weddle, Carie B., Sandra Steiger, Christopher G. Hamaker, et al.. (2012). Cuticular hydrocarbons as a basis for chemosensory self‐referencing in crickets: a potentially universal mechanism facilitating polyandry in insects. Ecology Letters. 16(3). 346–353. 45 indexed citations
17.
Ower, Geoffrey, et al.. (2009). When Love Comes Calling: Measuring Sexual Selection on Sagebrush Crickets. The UW National Parks Service Research Station Annual Reports. 32. 49–53.
18.
Leman, Joseph, Carie B. Weddle, Susan N. Gershman, et al.. (2008). Lovesick: immunological costs of mating to male sagebrush crickets. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 22(1). 163–171. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026