Gary G. Scott

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Gary G. Scott is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Gary G. Scott has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Biomaterials, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Gary G. Scott's work include Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (7 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers) and Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications (4 papers). Gary G. Scott is often cited by papers focused on Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (7 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (4 papers) and Polydiacetylene-based materials and applications (4 papers). Gary G. Scott collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Gary G. Scott's co-authors include Rein V. Ulijn, Tell Tuttle, Yousef M. Abul‐Haija, Pim W. J. M. Frederix, Daniela Kalafatović, Charalampos G. Pappas, Nadeem Javid, Neil T. Hunt, Everett L. Worthington and Christopher J. Bettinger and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Advanced Materials and Langmuir.

In The Last Decade

Gary G. Scott

9 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

Exploring the sequence space for (tri-)peptide self-assem... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gary G. Scott United Kingdom 8 929 666 444 251 131 9 1.2k
Alexandra Graff Switzerland 13 279 0.3× 812 1.2× 409 0.9× 190 0.8× 27 0.2× 15 1.4k
Ayala Lampel Israel 16 897 1.0× 835 1.3× 429 1.0× 296 1.2× 125 1.0× 38 1.5k
Faifan Tantakitti United States 12 892 1.0× 526 0.8× 543 1.2× 331 1.3× 75 0.6× 15 1.2k
Derek M. Ryan United States 13 1.0k 1.1× 640 1.0× 545 1.2× 322 1.3× 84 0.6× 13 1.3k
Yousef M. Abul‐Haija United Kingdom 21 1.3k 1.4× 1.1k 1.6× 732 1.6× 346 1.4× 203 1.5× 29 1.9k
Katie E. Styan Australia 13 669 0.7× 464 0.7× 400 0.9× 180 0.7× 104 0.8× 18 944
Frank Versluis Netherlands 18 596 0.6× 619 0.9× 370 0.8× 179 0.7× 42 0.3× 26 1.0k
Steve Santoso United States 7 1.3k 1.4× 1.2k 1.7× 697 1.6× 238 0.9× 179 1.4× 7 1.8k
Lisa M. Carrick United Kingdom 7 744 0.8× 460 0.7× 376 0.8× 126 0.5× 92 0.7× 8 918
Jaclyn Raeburn United Kingdom 13 1.6k 1.7× 762 1.1× 932 2.1× 485 1.9× 61 0.5× 13 1.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Gary G. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gary G. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gary G. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gary G. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gary G. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gary G. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gary G. Scott. The network helps show where Gary G. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gary G. Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gary G. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gary G. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gary G. Scott. Gary G. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Scott, Gary G., Tim Börner, Martin E. Leser, Tim J. Wooster, & Tell Tuttle. (2022). Directed Discovery of Tetrapeptide Emulsifiers. Frontiers in Chemistry. 10. 822868–822868. 11 indexed citations
2.
Scott, Gary G., et al.. (2018). Computational prediction of tripeptide-dipeptide co-assembly. Molecular Physics. 117(9-12). 1151–1163. 22 indexed citations
3.
Lampel, Ayala, Scott A. McPhee, Hang‐Ah Park, et al.. (2017). Polymeric peptide pigments with sequence-encoded properties. Science. 356(6342). 1064–1068. 268 indexed citations
4.
Abul‐Haija, Yousef M., Gary G. Scott, Jugal Kishore Sahoo, Tell Tuttle, & Rein V. Ulijn. (2017). Cooperative, ion-sensitive co-assembly of tripeptide hydrogels. Chemical Communications. 53(69). 9562–9565. 74 indexed citations
5.
Scott, Gary G., et al.. (2016). Emulsifiers: Tripeptide Emulsifiers (Adv. Mater. 7/2016). Advanced Materials. 28(7). 1329–1329. 5 indexed citations
6.
Scott, Gary G., et al.. (2015). Tripeptide Emulsifiers. Advanced Materials. 28(7). 1381–1386. 72 indexed citations
7.
Frederix, Pim W. J. M., Gary G. Scott, Yousef M. Abul‐Haija, et al.. (2014). Exploring the sequence space for (tri-)peptide self-assembly to design and discover new hydrogels. Nature Chemistry. 7(1). 30–37. 659 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Scott, Gary G., Sangita Roy, Yousef M. Abul‐Haija, et al.. (2013). Pickering Stabilized Peptide Gel Particles as Tunable Microenvironments for Biocatalysis. Langmuir. 29(46). 14321–14327. 42 indexed citations
9.
Worthington, Everett L. & Gary G. Scott. (1983). Goal Selection for Counseling with Potentially Religious Clients by Professional and Student Counselors in Explicitly Christian or Secular Settings. Journal of Psychology and Theology. 11(4). 318–329. 51 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026