G.A. Armstrong

1.8k total citations
98 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

G.A. Armstrong is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, G.A. Armstrong has authored 98 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 83 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 13 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in G.A. Armstrong's work include Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (60 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (57 papers) and Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (22 papers). G.A. Armstrong is often cited by papers focused on Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design (60 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (57 papers) and Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (22 papers). G.A. Armstrong collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and United States. G.A. Armstrong's co-authors include Abhinav Kranti, C. K. Maiti, J. R. Ayres, S. D. Brotherton, Dipankar Ghosh, Mukta Singh Parihar, Suresh Uppal, M. S. Alam, A. S. Greenberg and Jean‐Pierre Raskin and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Applied Physics Letters and IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

In The Last Decade

G.A. Armstrong

90 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
G.A. Armstrong United Kingdom	23	1.3k	213	128	105	29	98	1.4k
T. Schulz Germany	23	1.2k 0.9×	140 0.7×	97 0.8×	233 2.2×	4 0.1×	76	1.5k
F. Andrieu France	20	1.5k 1.1×	273 1.3×	101 0.8×	170 1.6×	4 0.1×	128	1.6k
Steven H. Voldman United States	23	1.7k 1.3×	59 0.3×	49 0.4×	63 0.6×	6 0.2×	133	1.8k
Artur Jachimowicz Austria	11	288 0.2×	192 0.9×	195 1.5×	28 0.3×	6 0.2×	19	411
Kimmo Kokkonen Finland	15	323 0.2×	420 2.0×	277 2.2×	54 0.5×	16 0.6×	47	593
T. L. Linnik Ukraine	12	177 0.1×	118 0.6×	293 2.3×	78 0.7×	9 0.3×	33	403
C. B. Fleddermann United States	15	441 0.3×	83 0.4×	180 1.4×	139 1.3×	5 0.2×	41	588
Jens Reermann Germany	13	214 0.2×	286 1.3×	148 1.2×	249 2.4×	22 0.8×	22	604
Didit Yudistira Belgium	14	328 0.2×	244 1.1×	305 2.4×	140 1.3×	7 0.2×	47	550
Ben-Yuan Gu China	13	294 0.2×	180 0.8×	416 3.3×	65 0.6×	3 0.1×	52	631

Countries citing papers authored by G.A. Armstrong

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.A. Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.A. Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.A. Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.A. Armstrong

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.A. Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.A. Armstrong. The network helps show where G.A. Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.A. Armstrong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.A. Armstrong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.A. Armstrong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.A. Armstrong. G.A. Armstrong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Parihar, Mukta Singh, Dipankar Ghosh, G.A. Armstrong, & Abhinav Kranti. (2012). Bipolar snapback in junctionless transistors for capacitorless dynamic random access memory. Applied Physics Letters. 101(26). 26 indexed citations

Alam, M. S., et al.. (2012). Investigations of analog/RF performance for underlap graphene nano-ribbon field effect transistor (GNRFET). 49–53. 2 indexed citations

Alam, M. S., et al.. (2011). Design of low noise Amplifier using 90nm gate underlap SOI MOSFET for millimeter wave applications. 19. 308–311. 2 indexed citations

Kranti, Abhinav, et al.. (2010). Analog/RF performance of sub-100 nm SOI MOSFETs with non-classical gate-source/drain underlap channel design. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 24. 45–48. 13 indexed citations

Kranti, Abhinav & G.A. Armstrong. (2009). High temperature performance of OTA with non-ideal Double Gate SOI MOSFETs. 8. 1–2. 1 indexed citations

Kranti, Abhinav, et al.. (2009). Underlap channel UTBB MOSFETs for low—power analog/RF applications. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 173–176. 9 indexed citations

Armstrong, G.A., et al.. (2007). Optimisation of trench isolated bipolar transistors on SOI substrates by 3D electro-thermal simulations. Solid-State Electronics. 51(9). 1221–1228. 1 indexed citations

Armstrong, G.A., et al.. (2007). Scaling issues for analogue circuits using Double Gate SOI transistors. Solid-State Electronics. 51(2). 320–327. 10 indexed citations

Maiti, C. K. & G.A. Armstrong. (2007). Technology Computer Aided Design for Si, SiGe and GaAs Integrated Circuits. Institution of Engineering and Technology eBooks. 8 indexed citations

10.

Kranti, Abhinav & G.A. Armstrong. (2007). Comparative analysis of nanoscale MOS device architectures for RF applications. Semiconductor Science and Technology. 22(5). 481–491. 25 indexed citations

11.

Blokland, Willem, et al.. (2006). SNS Ring and RTBT Beam Current Monitor. AIP conference proceedings. 868. 238–245. 2 indexed citations

12.

Kranti, Abhinav & G.A. Armstrong. (2006). Engineering source/drain extension regions in nanoscale double gate (DG) SOI MOSFETs: Analytical model and design considerations. Solid-State Electronics. 50(3). 437–447. 60 indexed citations

13.

Alam, M. S., et al.. (2003). Non‐linear modeling of 0.18‐μM CMOS using neural network. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters. 37(1). 53–56. 3 indexed citations

14.

Armstrong, G.A., et al.. (2003). Characterization of negative resistance and bipolar latchup in thin film SOI transistors by two-dimensional numerical simulation. 44–45.

15.

Armstrong, G.A., et al.. (2002). Improved physical modelling for accurate simulation of bipolar effects in thin film SOI MOSFETs. 32. 46–47.

16.

Armstrong, G.A., S. D. Brotherton, & J. R. Ayres. (1996). A comparison of the kink effect in polysilicon thin film transistors and silicon on insulator transistors. Solid-State Electronics. 39(9). 1337–1346. 37 indexed citations

17.

Armstrong, G.A., et al.. (1992). Simulation of ultra thin film SOI transistors using a non-local ballistic model for impact ionisation. Solid-State Electronics. 35(12). 1761–1770. 4 indexed citations

18.

Armstrong, G.A., et al.. (1979). Boundary-limited thermal conductivity of hcpHe4. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 20(3). 1061–1064. 21 indexed citations

19.

Armstrong, G.A. & Mairéad Butler. (1976). Engineering design and evaluation of s.a.w. pulse compression filters with low time sidelobes. Radio and Electronic Engineer. 46(5). 221–221. 6 indexed citations

20.

Armstrong, G.A., et al.. (1971). Pinch-off in insulated-gate field effect transistors. Solid-State Electronics. 14(8). 760–764. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact