Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Nanomaterials-assisted photothermal therapy for breast cancer: State-of-the-art advances and future perspectives
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Tripathi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Tripathi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Tripathi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Tripathi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Tripathi. The network helps show where G. Tripathi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Tripathi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Tripathi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Tripathi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Tripathi. G. Tripathi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tripathi, G., et al.. (2018). Toxicity assessment of zinc oxide nanoparticle in the earthworm, Eisenia fetida.. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY INDIA. 21(2). 1277–1284.
9.
Tripathi, G., et al.. (2016). Field parasitisation of top borer larva by Rhaconotus scirpophagae Wilkinson. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences. 24(1). 178–179.1 indexed citations
10.
Ali, Hazrat & G. Tripathi. (2014). Assessment of toxicity of silver nanoparticles in an air-breathing freshwater catfish, Clarias batrachus.. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY INDIA. 17(1). 151–154.3 indexed citations
Tripathi, G., et al.. (2009). Effects of thiouracil and thyroxine on enzymes, nucleotide and protein profile of a catfish.. Biochemical and Cellular Archives. 9(1). 123–127.1 indexed citations
13.
Tripathi, G., et al.. (2008). General properties of cytoplasmic malate dehydrogenase from some tropical earthworms.. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY INDIA. 11(1). 29–32.2 indexed citations
14.
Tripathi, G., et al.. (2008). Role of biotic and abiotic factors on the population dynamics of sugarcane woolly aphid, Ceratovacuna lanigera Zehntner and its natural enemies in sugarcane.. Current Science. 94(6). 718–720.2 indexed citations
15.
Tripathi, G., Ragini Kumari, & Brij Mohan Sharma. (2007). Mesofaunal biodiversity and its importance in Thar desert.. Revista de estudios extremeños. 28(2 Suppl). 503–15.6 indexed citations
16.
Tripathi, G.. (1998). A biomolecular model for environmental adaptations in animals. 13–21.1 indexed citations
17.
Tripathi, G.. (1995). Record of parasite and predator complex of sugarcane woolly aphid, Ceratovacuna lanigera Zehnt. in Nagaland.. 44(11). 839–841.3 indexed citations
18.
Tripathi, G.. (1993). A review on molecular physiology of malate and lactate dehydrogenases in fishes.. PubMed. 6(3). 286–318.2 indexed citations
19.
Tripathi, G., et al.. (1990). New recold of Beauveria bassiana (Bats) Yuill, an entomogenous fungus on mango hopper Idioscopus spp.. Indian journal of plant protection. 18(1). 140–140.1 indexed citations
20.
Tripathi, G., et al.. (1979). Sugarcane scale insect and its control.. Indian Farming. 29(2). 19–21.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.