G. Tăbăcaru

2.4k total citations
52 papers, 558 citations indexed

About

G. Tăbăcaru is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Tăbăcaru has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 558 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 18 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 17 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in G. Tăbăcaru's work include Nuclear physics research studies (30 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (16 papers). G. Tăbăcaru is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (30 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (16 papers) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (16 papers). G. Tăbăcaru collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. G. Tăbăcaru's co-authors include L. Trache, R. E. Tribble, Changbo Fu, G. Chubarian, V. Z. Goldberg, R. E. Tribble, V. E. Iacob, G. V. Rogachev, T. Al-Abdullah and N. Nica and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Chemical Communications.

In The Last Decade

G. Tăbăcaru

47 papers receiving 546 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Tăbăcaru United States 16 447 224 130 72 60 52 558
L. Canton Italy 15 602 1.3× 299 1.3× 72 0.6× 49 0.7× 71 1.2× 92 763
Huo Junde China 17 491 1.1× 218 1.0× 273 2.1× 100 1.4× 72 1.2× 30 628
F. Giacoppo Norway 12 354 0.8× 107 0.5× 152 1.2× 74 1.0× 24 0.4× 34 447
S. Stave United States 12 306 0.7× 128 0.6× 218 1.7× 82 1.1× 28 0.5× 40 459
S. V. Förtsch South Africa 14 520 1.2× 233 1.0× 143 1.1× 115 1.6× 19 0.3× 31 552
M. Kisieliński Poland 14 504 1.1× 388 1.7× 171 1.3× 56 0.8× 32 0.5× 67 690
M. R. D. Rodrigues Italy 15 467 1.0× 147 0.7× 247 1.9× 104 1.4× 23 0.4× 56 567
S. Mukhopadhyay India 16 449 1.0× 191 0.9× 166 1.3× 77 1.1× 15 0.3× 46 518
V.A. Plujko Ukraine 12 501 1.1× 172 0.8× 266 2.0× 231 3.2× 33 0.6× 60 574
F. D. Smit South Africa 15 590 1.3× 237 1.1× 181 1.4× 127 1.8× 18 0.3× 52 639

Countries citing papers authored by G. Tăbăcaru

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Tăbăcaru's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Tăbăcaru with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Tăbăcaru more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Tăbăcaru

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Tăbăcaru. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Tăbăcaru. The network helps show where G. Tăbăcaru may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Tăbăcaru

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Tăbăcaru. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Tăbăcaru based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Tăbăcaru. G. Tăbăcaru is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Rodrigues, M. R. D., V. E. Iacob, N. Nica, et al.. (2023). Production of 99Mo in inverse kinematics heavy ion reactions. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 212. 111162–111162.
3.
Berg, G.P.A., P. D. Shidling, M. Couder, et al.. (2023). Expanding RIB capabilities at the Cyclotron Institute: 3He-LIG production with an isobar separator LSTAR. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 541. 99–101.
4.
Burns, Jonathan D., E. E. Tereshatov, Bowen Zhang, et al.. (2022). Complexation of Astatine(III) with Ketones: Roles of NO3Counterion and Exploration of Possible Binding Modes. Inorganic Chemistry. 61(31). 12087–12096. 7 indexed citations
5.
Rodrigues, M. R. D., V. E. Iacob, N. Nica, et al.. (2021). Enhanced production of 99Mo in inverse kinematics heavy ion reactions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 252. 8003–8003. 2 indexed citations
6.
Tereshatov, E. E., Jonathan D. Burns, G. Tăbăcaru, et al.. (2021). Separation, speciation, and mechanism of astatine and bismuth extraction from nitric acid into 1-octanol and methyl anthranilate. Separation and Purification Technology. 282. 120088–120088. 8 indexed citations
7.
Souliotis, G. A., M. R. D. Rodrigues, Ke Wang, et al.. (2019). A novel approach to medical radioisotope production using inverse kinematics: A successful production test of the theranostic radionuclide 67Cu. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 149. 89–95. 7 indexed citations
8.
Martin, Thomas M., et al.. (2014). Preliminary Production of 211At at the Texas A&M University Cyclotron Institute. Health Physics. 107(1). 1–9. 4 indexed citations
9.
Goldberg, V. Z., B. T. Roeder, G. V. Rogachev, et al.. (2012). Resonance Scattering to Study Exotic Nuclei at the Limits of Stability. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 337. 12008–12008. 1 indexed citations
10.
Melconian, D., S. Triambak, C. Bordeanu, et al.. (2011). Experimental Validation of the Largest Calculated Isospin-Symmetry-Breaking Effect in a Superallowed Fermi Decay. Physical Review Letters. 107(18). 182301–182301. 14 indexed citations
11.
Tăbăcaru, G., et al.. (2010). First operation of the charge-breeder electron-cyclotron-resonance ion source at the Texas A&M Cyclotron Institute. Review of Scientific Instruments. 81(2). 02A901–02A901. 1 indexed citations
12.
Goldberg, V. Z., B. T. Roeder, G. V. Rogachev, et al.. (2010). First observation of 14F. Physics Letters B. 692(5). 307–311. 31 indexed citations
13.
McCleskey, M., G. Tăbăcaru, B. T. Roeder, et al.. (2009). Experimental study of cross-sections for some medical radioisotopes production via proton induced nuclear reactions on natMo up to 40 MeV. APS. 3. 1 indexed citations
14.
Trache, L., R. E. Tribble, Chenyu Shi, et al.. (2008). SU-GG-T-240: New Method of An HPGe Detector Precise Efficiency Calibration with Experimental Measurements and Monte Carlo Simulations. Medical Physics. 35(6Part12). 2780–2780.
15.
Pizzone, R. G., C. Spitaleri, M. La Cognata, et al.. (2008). AGB fluorine nucleosynthesis studied by means of Trojan-horse method: the case of [sup 15]N(p,α)[sup 12]C. AIP conference proceedings. 1012. 155–159. 1 indexed citations
16.
Iacob, V. E., J. C. Hardy, C. A. Gagliardi, et al.. (2006). Branching ratios for theβdecay ofNa21. Physical Review C. 74(1). 9 indexed citations
17.
Tăbăcaru, G., Azhari Azhari, James F. Brinkley, et al.. (2006). Scattering ofBe7andB8and the astrophysicalS17factor. Physical Review C. 73(2). 34 indexed citations
18.
Borderie, B., R. Bougault, E. Galichet, et al.. (2004). Liquid-gas phase transition in hot nuclei studied with INDRA. Nuclear Physics A. 734. 495–503. 25 indexed citations
19.
Angulo, C., P. Descouvemont, M. Couder, et al.. (2003). Spectroscopy of the proton drip line nucleus 19Na by 1H(18Ne,p)18Ne elastic scattering. Nuclear Physics A. 719. C201–C204.
20.
Angulo, C., M. Couder, Y. El Masri, et al.. (2002). Realization and analysis of He-implanted foils for the measurement of (α,γ) reaction cross-sections in nuclear astrophysics. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 197(1-2). 165–171. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026