This map shows the geographic impact of G. Kingston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Kingston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Kingston more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Kingston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Kingston. The network helps show where G. Kingston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Kingston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Kingston.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Kingston based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Kingston. G. Kingston is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kingston, G.. (2011). The difficult 2010 sugarcane harvest in Australia: causes, effects and learnings.. 28–36.3 indexed citations
3.
Singels, A., Matthew R. Jones, Cheryl Porter, et al.. (2010). The DSSATv4.5 Canegro model: a useful decision support tool for research and management of sugarcane production..8 indexed citations
4.
Gilbert, R. A., et al.. (2010). EFFECT OF HARVEST METHOD ON MICROCLIMATE AND SUGARCANE YIELD IN FLORIDA AND COSTA RICA.2 indexed citations
5.
Jones, Matthew R., Cheryl Porter, James W. Jones, et al.. (2007). Incorporating the Canegro sugarcane model into the DSSAT V4 crop modelling system.. 438–443.1 indexed citations
6.
Kingston, G., et al.. (2007). The better sugarcane initiative - impacts and benefits on the global sugarcane industry.. 199–204.
7.
Kingston, G., et al.. (2007). RIPENING RESPONSE OF TWELVE SUGARCANE CULTIVARS TO MODDUS ® (TRIN-EXAPAC ETHYL). 328–338.1 indexed citations
Kingston, G. & R. J. Lawn. (2003). MANAGING NATURAL RESOURCES USED IN SUGAR PRODUCTION SYSTEMS: EIGHT YEARS ON. ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University).6 indexed citations
10.
Kingston, G., et al.. (2003). Final report SRDC Project CLW009 Improving yield and ccs in sugarcane through the application of silicon based amendments.12 indexed citations
11.
Kingston, G.. (2003). Ratooning and ratoon management in overseas cane-sugar industries.3 indexed citations
12.
Kingston, G., et al.. (2003). WHAT IS THE IMPACT OF GREEN CANE TRASH BLANKETS IN WET AND TROPICAL ENVIRONMENTS.6 indexed citations
13.
Oliveira, Mauro Wagner de, Paulo César Ocheuze Trivelin, G. Kingston, et al.. (2002). DECOMPOSITION AND RELEASE OF NUTRIENTS FROM SUGARCANE TRASH IN TWO AGRICULTURAL ENVIRONMENTS IN BRAZIL. 290–296.27 indexed citations
14.
Kingston, G.. (2002). Recognising the impact of climate on CCS of sugarcane across tropical and sub-tropical regions of the Australian sugar industry.. 145–152.8 indexed citations
15.
Kingston, G., et al.. (2001). Plant cane responses to silicated products in the Mossman, Innisfail and Bundaberg districts. 297–303.14 indexed citations
16.
Nelson, Paul N., et al.. (2001). Diagnosis and Management of Sodic Soils under Sugarcane. ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University).12 indexed citations
17.
Keating, B. A., G. Kingston, A. W. Wood, N. Berding, & R.C. Muchow. (1999). Monitoring nitrogen at the mill to guide N fertilisation practice on farm. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 10–19.11 indexed citations
18.
Kingston, G. & R. L. Aitken. (1996). Final Report SRDC Project BS98S Factors Affecting the Residual Value of Lime.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.