Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Effect of the Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme Inhibitor Benazepril on the Progression of Chronic Renal Insufficiency
19961.3k citationsGiuseppe Maschio, Daniele Alberti et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Citations per year, relative to G. Janin G. Janin (= 1×)
peers
Maura Ravera
Countries citing papers authored by G. Janin
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Janin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Janin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Janin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Janin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Janin. The network helps show where G. Janin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Janin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Janin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Janin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Janin. G. Janin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Locatelli, Francesco, G Maschio, Johannes F.E. Mann, et al.. (1997). Long-term progression of chronic renal insufficiency in the AIPRI extension study. Kidney International. 51(63).21 indexed citations
6.
Locatelli, Francesco, G Maschio, Claudio Ponticelli, et al.. (1997). Long-term progression of chronic renal insufficiency in the AIPRI Extension Study. The Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Progressive Renal Insufficiency Study Group.. PubMed. 63. S63–6.36 indexed citations
Maschio, Giuseppe, Daniele Alberti, G. Janin, et al.. (1996). Effect of the Angiotensin-Converting–Enzyme Inhibitor Benazepril on the Progression of Chronic Renal Insufficiency. New England Journal of Medicine. 334(15). 939–945.1335 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Mayaudon, H., X Chanudet, G. Janin, & O. Madonna. (1995). [Comparison of the efficacy of enalapril + hydrochlorothiazide and captopril + hydrochlorothiazide combinations in mild-to-moderate arterial hypertension by ambulatory measurement of blood pressure].. PubMed. 44(5). 235–41.1 indexed citations
10.
Battistella, Pascal, et al.. (1990). [Ambulatory blood pressure profile during 48 hours in patients treated with chronic hemodialysis].. PubMed. 83(8). 1223–7.3 indexed citations
11.
Michel, Pascal, et al.. (1986). [Eradication of hepatitis B in dialysed patients through repeated sero vaccinations].. PubMed. 7(3). 114–7.1 indexed citations
12.
Blanc-Brunat, N, et al.. (1978). [Late diagnosis of cystinosis in 2 brothers: histological and ultrastructural renal study].. PubMed. 35(5). 486–503.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.