G. J. van der Wildt

750 total citations
31 papers, 606 citations indexed

About

G. J. van der Wildt is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, G. J. van der Wildt has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 606 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Ophthalmology and 8 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in G. J. van der Wildt's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (25 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). G. J. van der Wildt is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (25 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). G. J. van der Wildt collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. G. J. van der Wildt's co-authors include C. Bulens, C. J. Keemink, J. D. Meerwaldt, M.A. Bouman, G. van den Brink, J. van de Kraats, A. V. van den Berg, R.G. Waarts, A. Volkers and P.I.M. Schmitz and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain, Neurology and Annals of Neurology.

In The Last Decade

G. J. van der Wildt

31 papers receiving 583 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
G. J. van der Wildt Netherlands	16	412	170	146	132	118	31	606
Scott B. Steinman United States	14	517 1.3×	104 0.6×	38 0.3×	84 0.6×	45 0.4×	19	634
Petra Kozma United States	10	293 0.7×	78 0.5×	74 0.5×	149 1.1×	76 0.6×	18	571
Ann B. Barnet United States	17	476 1.2×	46 0.3×	43 0.3×	41 0.3×	70 0.6×	28	783
Antti Raninen Finland	13	415 1.0×	93 0.5×	16 0.1×	96 0.7×	94 0.8×	20	502
C. J. Keemink Netherlands	10	255 0.6×	44 0.3×	51 0.3×	46 0.3×	48 0.4×	12	336
L Cigánek Slovakia	14	505 1.2×	32 0.2×	41 0.3×	50 0.4×	83 0.7×	41	692
Lawrence E. Leguire United States	21	614 1.5×	544 3.2×	43 0.3×	452 3.4×	291 2.5×	62	1.1k
Janice M. Wensveen United States	11	286 0.7×	358 2.1×	69 0.5×	180 1.4×	52 0.4×	21	573
G. Mohn Netherlands	13	354 0.9×	249 1.5×	19 0.1×	100 0.8×	101 0.9×	31	667
Ann M. Skoczenski United States	11	320 0.8×	175 1.0×	13 0.1×	56 0.4×	55 0.5×	16	515

Countries citing papers authored by G. J. van der Wildt

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. J. van der Wildt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. J. van der Wildt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. J. van der Wildt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. J. van der Wildt

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. J. van der Wildt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. J. van der Wildt. The network helps show where G. J. van der Wildt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. J. van der Wildt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. J. van der Wildt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. J. van der Wildt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. J. van der Wildt. G. J. van der Wildt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Elshout, Joris A., et al.. (2012). Transfer Effects of Training-Induced Visual Field Recovery in Patients With Chronic Stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 19(3). 212–225. 19 indexed citations

Verster, Joris C., et al.. (2011). Oculomotor behavior of hemianopic chronic stroke patients in a driving simulator is modulated by vision training. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 29(5). 347–359. 12 indexed citations

Raemaekers, Mathijs, et al.. (2010). Effects of Vision Restoration Training on Early Visual Cortex in Patients With Cerebral Blindness Investigated With Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology. 105(2). 872–882. 27 indexed citations

Wildt, G. J. van der, et al.. (2008). Properties of the regained visual field after visual detection training of hemianopsia patients. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 26(4-5). 365–375. 17 indexed citations

Wildt, G. J. van der, et al.. (1997). Visual field enlargement by neuropsychological training of a hemianopsia patient. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 93(4). 277–292. 16 indexed citations

Wildt, G. J. van der, et al.. (1995). ‘When is VISION asked too much?’. Documenta Ophthalmologica. 90(1). 99–105. 1 indexed citations

Bulens, C., et al.. (1989). SPATIAL CONTRAST SENSITIVITY IN UNILATERAL CEREBRAL ISCHAEMIC LESIONS INVOLVING THE POSTERIOR VISUAL PATHWAY. Brain. 112(2). 507–520. 27 indexed citations

Bulens, C., et al.. (1988). Effect of stimulus orientation on contrast sensitivity in Parkinson's disease. Neurology. 38(1). 76–76. 53 indexed citations

Bulens, C., J. D. Meerwaldt, G. J. van der Wildt, & C. J. Keemink. (1988). Spatial contrast sensitivity in clinical neurology. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 90(1). 29–34. 4 indexed citations

10.

Wildt, G. J. van der, et al.. (1988). Contrast sensitivity for oscillating sine wave gratings during ocular fixation and pursuit. Vision Research. 28(7). 819–826. 25 indexed citations

11.

Bulens, C., et al.. (1987). Effect of levodopa treatment on contrast sensitivity in Parkinson's disease. Annals of Neurology. 22(3). 365–369. 75 indexed citations

12.

Volkers, A., et al.. (1987). Spatial contrast sensitivity and the diagnosis of amblyopia.. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 71(1). 58–65. 24 indexed citations

13.

Wildt, G. J. van der, et al.. (1985). Foveal inhibition measured with suprathreshold stimuli. Vision Research. 25(10). 1413–1421. 5 indexed citations

14.

Wildt, G. J. van der & R.G. Waarts. (1983). Contrast detection and its dependence on the presence of edges and lines in the stimulus field. Vision Research. 23(8). 821–830. 13 indexed citations

15.

Wildt, G. J. van der, et al.. (1982). Propagating inhibition as a function of flash diameter and duration. Vision Research. 22(3). 401–406. 7 indexed citations

16.

Wildt, G. J. van der, et al.. (1981). Propagation of inhibition. Vision Research. 21(12). 1765–1771. 15 indexed citations

17.

Wildt, G. J. van der, et al.. (1979). The influence of the stimulus width on the contrast sensitivity function in amblyopia.. PubMed. 18(8). 842–7. 13 indexed citations

18.

Keemink, C. J., et al.. (1979). Microprocessor-controlled contrast sensitivity measurements. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing. 17(3). 371–378. 15 indexed citations

19.

Wildt, G. J. van der & M.A. Bouman. (1974). Dependence of the Dynamic Behaviour of the Human Pupil System on the Input Signal. Optica Acta International Journal of Optics. 21(1). 59–74. 4 indexed citations

20.

Wildt, G. J. van der, M.A. Bouman, & J. van de Kraats. (1974). The Effect of Anticipation on the Transfer Function of the Human Lens System. Optica Acta International Journal of Optics. 21(11). 843–860. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact