614 total citations 40 papers, 483 citations indexed
About
G Fredj is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Surgery and Oncology.
According to data from OpenAlex, G Fredj has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 483 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Pharmacology, 6 papers in Surgery and 6 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in G Fredj's work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (5 papers). G Fredj is often cited by papers focused on Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers) and Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (5 papers). G Fredj collaborates with scholars based in France, Russia and South Korea. G Fredj's co-authors include J.L. Misset, G Mathé, Gilles Peytavin, E. Chenu, S. Brienza, C Bourut, Masazumi Eriguchi, Yoshinori Kidani, M. Micoud and Henri Bismuth and has published in prestigious journals such as Hepatology, Clinical Infectious Diseases and International Journal of Pharmaceutics.
In The Last Decade
G Fredj
38 papers
receiving
445 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of G Fredj's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G Fredj with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G Fredj more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G Fredj. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G Fredj. The network helps show where G Fredj may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G Fredj
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G Fredj.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G Fredj based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G Fredj. G Fredj is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fredj, G, et al.. (1993). [Comparison of tacrine hepatotoxicity in patients with Alzheimer disease or AIDS].. PubMed. 47(3). 245–7.1 indexed citations
9.
Azoulay, Daniel, Antoinette Lemoine, R. Adam, et al.. (1993). Lidocaine metabolite formation in the liver donor as a predictive test for the safe and efficient introduction of cyclosporine in the recipient.. PubMed. 25(3). 2275–8.7 indexed citations
Fredj, G, et al.. (1992). Open trial of tacrine therapy in 70 HIV-infected patients.. PubMed. 30(9). 313–6.3 indexed citations
13.
Fredj, G, et al.. (1989). Tetrahydroaminoacridine in HIV infections. The THA Study Group.. PubMed. 27(8). 408–10.1 indexed citations
14.
Fredj, G, et al.. (1989). [Pharmacokinetic study of pyrazinamide and pyrazinoic acid in subjects with normal renal function and patients with renal failure].. PubMed. 44(1). 1–4.2 indexed citations
15.
Adam, René, et al.. (1989). Liver preservation: 31P and 13C NMR spectroscopic assessment of liver energy and metabolism after cold storage in Collins, Marshall, Ringer's lactate, UW and modified UW solutions.. PubMed. 21(1 Pt 2). 1327–9.10 indexed citations
Fredj, G, et al.. (1986). [Topical digestive drugs with a clay base. Influence on the absorption of cimetidine].. PubMed. 41(1). 23–5.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.