G E Mead

652 total citations
13 papers, 293 citations indexed

About

G E Mead is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, G E Mead has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 293 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 6 papers in Epidemiology and 5 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in G E Mead's work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (6 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers). G E Mead is often cited by papers focused on Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (6 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers) and Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers). G E Mead collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. G E Mead's co-authors include Anne Farrell, A.J. Mortimer, Charles McCollum, Joanna M. Wardlaw, Steff Lewis, Scott Ramsay, Martin Dennis, Alessia M. Lardi, Michael Sharpe and Mansur A. Kutlubaev and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

G E Mead

11 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G E Mead United Kingdom 8 149 139 119 87 81 13 293
J Slaný Austria 10 150 1.0× 117 0.8× 90 0.8× 214 2.5× 45 0.6× 42 386
Serge Iglesias France 5 100 0.7× 121 0.9× 127 1.1× 29 0.3× 56 0.7× 5 339
A. Reccius Chile 7 63 0.4× 105 0.8× 166 1.4× 49 0.6× 37 0.5× 21 234
Patrizia Carità Italy 10 91 0.6× 145 1.0× 40 0.3× 191 2.2× 54 0.7× 25 403
Luis Cava United States 8 128 0.9× 138 1.0× 115 1.0× 33 0.4× 14 0.2× 15 268
Mushtaq Qureshi United States 11 109 0.7× 187 1.3× 207 1.7× 44 0.5× 25 0.3× 34 330
A. Doris Baumgartner Switzerland 4 107 0.7× 222 1.6× 51 0.4× 42 0.5× 28 0.3× 4 309
Firas Ali France 4 195 1.3× 258 1.9× 142 1.2× 23 0.3× 32 0.4× 6 434
Anne Falcou Italy 9 183 1.2× 297 2.1× 156 1.3× 43 0.5× 28 0.3× 22 371
Gregory Telman Israel 9 183 1.2× 160 1.2× 113 0.9× 110 1.3× 31 0.4× 47 331

Countries citing papers authored by G E Mead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G E Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G E Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G E Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G E Mead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G E Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G E Mead. The network helps show where G E Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G E Mead

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G E Mead. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G E Mead based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G E Mead. G E Mead is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Kutlubaev, Mansur A., Ho-Yan Yvonne Chun, Eileen Cowey, et al.. (2015). Interventions for post-stroke fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Stroke. 10. 111–112. 1 indexed citations
3.
Mead, G E, et al.. (2007). No evidence that severity of stroke in internal carotid artery occlusion is related to collateral arteries. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 45(3). 637–637.
4.
Mead, G E, et al.. (2006). Pharmacological cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and flutter.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6(1). 31–31. 1 indexed citations
6.
Mead, G E. (2000). How well does the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project classification predict the site and size of the infarct on brain imaging?. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 68(5). 558–562. 120 indexed citations
7.
Mead, G E, Steff Lewis, & Joanna M. Wardlaw. (2000). Variability in Doppler ultrasound influences referral of patients for carotid surgery. European Journal of Ultrasound. 12(2). 137–143. 35 indexed citations
8.
Mead, G E. (1999). The influence of randomized trials on the use of anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation. Age and Ageing. 28(5). 441–446. 12 indexed citations
9.
Mead, G E. (1999). Cardioversion for atrial fibrillation: the views of consultant physicians, geriatricians and cardiologists. Age and Ageing. 28(1). 73–75. 8 indexed citations
10.
Mead, G E, et al.. (1996). Neutrophil activation in jugular venous blood during carotid endarterectomy. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 11(2). 210–213. 3 indexed citations
11.
Fearn, Shirley J., et al.. (1996). Near infra‐red spectroscopy. Anaesthesia. 51(8). 800–800.
12.
Mead, G E, et al.. (1995). The influence of contralateral carotid stenosis and occlusion on cerebral oxygen saturation during carotid artery surgery. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 10(2). 198–206. 26 indexed citations
13.
Farrell, Anne, et al.. (1994). Light-reflective cerebral oximetry and jugular bulb venous oxygen saturation during carotid endarterectomy. British journal of surgery. 81(9). 1291–1295. 68 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026