G. E. Brink

2.0k total citations
103 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

G. E. Brink is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Environmental Chemistry and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, G. E. Brink has authored 103 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 74 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 51 papers in Environmental Chemistry and 26 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in G. E. Brink's work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (66 papers), Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (29 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (25 papers). G. E. Brink is often cited by papers focused on Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (66 papers), Turfgrass Adaptation and Management (29 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (25 papers). G. E. Brink collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. G. E. Brink's co-authors include K. R. Sistani, G. A. Pederson, D. E. Rowe, T. E. Fairbrother, G. C. Marten, Michael D. Casler, Ardeshir Adeli, Matt A. Sanderson, J. L. Oldham and S. L. McGowen and has published in prestigious journals such as Bioresource Technology, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry and Journal of Dairy Science.

In The Last Decade

G. E. Brink

100 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. E. Brink United States 21 854 530 515 438 205 103 1.6k
C. J. P. Gourley Australia 23 514 0.6× 676 1.3× 660 1.3× 331 0.8× 99 0.5× 49 1.5k
J. S. Rowarth New Zealand 19 416 0.5× 368 0.7× 532 1.0× 452 1.0× 175 0.9× 96 1.3k
W. P. McCaughey Canada 19 952 1.1× 237 0.4× 420 0.8× 265 0.6× 131 0.6× 48 1.5k
D. J. R. Cherney United States 23 1.2k 1.4× 273 0.5× 310 0.6× 447 1.0× 168 0.8× 103 1.7k
Karen Søegaard Denmark 26 1.1k 1.2× 244 0.5× 517 1.0× 508 1.2× 136 0.7× 88 1.7k
R. Mark Sulc United States 19 735 0.9× 230 0.4× 513 1.0× 537 1.2× 192 0.9× 64 1.4k
P. Mislevy United States 17 631 0.7× 310 0.6× 237 0.5× 380 0.9× 184 0.9× 88 1.1k
G. W. Roth United States 20 603 0.7× 240 0.5× 395 0.8× 530 1.2× 95 0.5× 42 1.1k
Bruce Coulman Canada 27 1.2k 1.4× 338 0.6× 214 0.4× 1.0k 2.4× 327 1.6× 121 2.2k
D. J. Undersander United States 24 885 1.0× 250 0.5× 238 0.5× 408 0.9× 245 1.2× 81 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by G. E. Brink

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. E. Brink's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. E. Brink with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. E. Brink more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. E. Brink

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. E. Brink. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. E. Brink. The network helps show where G. E. Brink may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. E. Brink

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. E. Brink. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. E. Brink based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. E. Brink. G. E. Brink is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Soder, K.J., G. E. Brink, Edward J. Raynor, & Michael D. Casler. (2022). Relationship between Temperate Grass Sward Characteristics and the Grazing Behavior of Dairy Heifers. Agronomy. 12(7). 1584–1584. 3 indexed citations
2.
Renz, Mark, et al.. (2018). Defining Mob Grazing in the Upper Midwestern United States. Journal of Extension. 56(4). 9 indexed citations
3.
Coblentz, W.K., et al.. (2018). Effects of growth stage and growing degree day accumulations on triticale forages: 2. In vitro disappearance of neutral detergent fiber. Journal of Dairy Science. 101(10). 8986–9003. 13 indexed citations
4.
Sanderson, Matt A., Robert Stout, & G. E. Brink. (2015). Productivity, Botanical Composition, and Nutritive Value of Commercial Pasture Mixtures. Agronomy Journal. 108(1). 93–100. 16 indexed citations
5.
Mohammed, Riazuddin, G. E. Brink, David M. Stevenson, et al.. (2014). Bacterial communities in the rumen of Holstein heifers differ when fed orchardgrass as pasture vs. hay. Frontiers in Microbiology. 5. 689–689. 30 indexed citations
6.
Coblentz, W.K., G. E. Brink, P.C. Hoffman, N.M. Esser, & Michael G. Bertram. (2014). Fall-grown oat to extend the fall grazing season for replacement dairy heifers. Journal of Dairy Science. 97(3). 1645–1660. 6 indexed citations
7.
Marita, Jane M., Ronald D. Hatfield, & G. E. Brink. (2009). In VitroProteolytic Inhibition, Polyphenol Oxidase Activity, and Solubleo-Diphenols in Grasses and Cereals. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 58(2). 959–966. 14 indexed citations
8.
Read, John J., K. R. Sistani, J. L. Oldham, & G. E. Brink. (2008). Double-cropping annual ryegrass and bermudagrass to reduce phosphorus levels in soil with history of poultry litter application. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 84(1). 93–104. 10 indexed citations
9.
Wood, C. W., et al.. (2007). Tillage and Forage System Effects on Forage Yields and Nutrient Uptake under Broiler Litter–Amended Soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 38(17-18). 2535–2556. 6 indexed citations
10.
Coblentz, W.K., G. E. Brink, N. P. Martin, & D. J. Undersander. (2007). Effects of harvest timing on estimates of rumen degradable protein from alfalfa forages. Poultry Science. 86. 39–39. 2 indexed citations
11.
12.
Sistani, K. R., Ardeshir Adeli, S. L. McGowen, Haile Tewolde, & G. E. Brink. (2007). Laboratory and field evaluation of broiler litter nitrogen mineralization. Bioresource Technology. 99(7). 2603–2611. 59 indexed citations
13.
Sistani, K. R., G. E. Brink, S. L. McGowen, D. E. Rowe, & J. L. Oldham. (2003). Characterization of broiler cake and broiler litter, the by-products of two management practices. Bioresource Technology. 90(1). 27–32. 47 indexed citations
14.
Sistani, K. R., G. A. Pederson, G. E. Brink, & D. E. Rowe. (2003). Nutrient Uptake by Ryegrass Cultivars and Crabgrass from a Highly Phosphorus‐Enriched Soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 26(12). 2521–2535. 7 indexed citations
15.
Brink, G. E., D. E. Rowe, & K. R. Sistani. (2002). Broiler Litter Application Effects on Yield and Nutrient Uptake of ‘Alicia’ Bermudagrass. Agronomy Journal. 94(4). 911–911. 4 indexed citations
16.
Pederson, G. A., Robert G. Pratt, & G. E. Brink. (2000). Response to Leaf Inoculations with Macrophomina phaseolina in White Clover. Crop Science. 40(3). 687–692. 2 indexed citations
17.
Pederson, G. A., G. E. Brink, & J. R. Caradus. (1999). Growth of United States versus New Zealand white clover cultivars in diverse grasses in Mississippi, USA. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 42(2). 115–123. 4 indexed citations
18.
Brink, G. E.. (1995). White Clover Growth and Morphology under Contrasting Cutting Regimes. Crop Science. 35(4). 1100–1103. 9 indexed citations
19.
Brink, G. E. & G. A. Pederson. (1993). White Clover Response to Grazing Method. Agronomy Journal. 85(4). 791–794. 10 indexed citations
20.
Brink, G. E. & T. E. Fairbrother. (1992). Forage Quality and Morphological Components of Diverse Clovers during Primary Spring Growth. Crop Science. 32(4). 1043–1048. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026