G. Demeter

570 citations
32 papers · 298 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

G. Demeter

31 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

G. Demeter
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 196
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 85
  • Computer Networks and Communications 85
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 32
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 2
Replace E. J. D’Angelo with:
E. J. D’Angelo United States
Th. K. Mavrogordatos Sweden
Carles Serrat Spain
T. Gaber Germany
I. R. Rahmonov Russia
L. Longobardi Italy
Daniel Carney United States
Fabian Maucher Germany
Christopher G. Wade United Kingdom
Н. А. Веретенов Russia
G. Demeter relative to E. J. D’Angelo United States E. J. D’Angelo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
E. J. D’Angelo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Demeter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Demeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Demeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Demeter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Demeter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Demeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Demeter. The network helps show where G. Demeter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside G. Demeter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Demeter Line = papers co-authored together G. Demeter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199943
2 200023
3 200020
4 200118
5 201618
6 200318
7 200816
8 199614
9 200712
10 201311
11 199810
12 20029
13 20058
14 20128
15 20057
16 19977
17 20067
18 20076
19 19966
20 19975

About G. Demeter

G. Demeter is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computer Networks and Communications, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Artificial Intelligence and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum optics and atomic interactions (18 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (10 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (10 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (9 papers), Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (8 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (7 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (7 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (196 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (85 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (85 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (32 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (2 citations). G. Demeter has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Lorenz Kramer, G. P. Djotyan, J. S. Bakos, Dmitry O. Krimer, David Dzsotjan, J. Szigeti, Z. Kis, P.N. Ignácz, G. Bíró and Ulrich Hohenester. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review A, Journal of the Optical Society of America B, Optics & Laser Technology, Physical review. A and Physics Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact