This map shows the geographic impact of G. Charlier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Charlier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Charlier more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Charlier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Charlier. The network helps show where G. Charlier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Charlier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Charlier.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Charlier based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. Charlier. G. Charlier is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mainil, Jacques, et al.. (2000). Les souches pathogènes d'Escherichia coli chez les chiens et chats : II) Données cliniques et bactériologiques sur les souches entéropathogènes. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).5 indexed citations
4.
Lieffrig, François, et al.. (2000). Isolation of virus-like particles from koi (Cyprinus carpio) suffering gill necrosis.. Bulletin of the European Association of Fish Pathologists. 20(2). 87–88.18 indexed citations
5.
Mainil, Jacques, et al.. (2000). Pathogenic Escherichia coli strains from dogs and cats. II. Clinical and bacteriological data on enteropathogenic E. coli strains.. Annales de médecine vétérinaire. 144(5). 335–343.2 indexed citations
Fontaine, Jacques, G. Charlier, & Marc Henroteaux. (1992). Anomaly of skin collagen: dermatosparaxis in a European cat. 24(145). 255–258.1 indexed citations
15.
Vanopdenbosch, E., et al.. (1992). Bovine torovirus: cell culture propagation of a respiratory isolate and some epidemiological data.. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift. 61(2). 45–49.4 indexed citations
16.
Poncelet, Luc, Inge Bjerkås, G. Charlier, et al.. (1990). Confirmation de la présence de Neospora caninum en Belgique. Annales de médecine vétérinaire. 134(7). 501–503.4 indexed citations
17.
Broes, André, et al.. (1990). First observations of viral haemorrhagic disease of rabbits (RHD) in Belgium.. Annales de médecine vétérinaire. 134(8). 567–571.3 indexed citations
18.
Meulemans, G., et al.. (1980). Isolation of an influenza A virus related to the New Jersey strain (H-Sw1) in fattening pigs.. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift. 49(1). 8–11.2 indexed citations
19.
Strobbe, Rik, et al.. (1976). Studies about the adjuvant activity of saponin fractions in foot and mouth disease vaccine. III. Comparison of the irritant, adjuvant and hemolytic activities of six commercial saponins and their hemolytic fractions obtained by chromatography on sephadex G 100.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 30(2). 173–81.4 indexed citations
20.
Strobbe, Rik, et al.. (1976). Routine titration of foot and mouth disease virus suspensions by analytical ultracentrifugation. 1: Sedimentation method.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 30(3). 325–31.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.