Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Congenital absence of the aortic arch
1959324 citationsG Celoria, Roy Β. PattonAmerican Heart Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of G Celoria's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G Celoria with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G Celoria more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G Celoria. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G Celoria. The network helps show where G Celoria may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G Celoria
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G Celoria.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G Celoria based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G Celoria. G Celoria is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Scharovsky, O. Graciela, Pablo Matar, Viviana R. Rozados, et al.. (2012). [Immunomodulation and antiangiogenesis in cancer therapy. From basic to clinical research].. PubMed. 72(1). 47–57.3 indexed citations
Celoria, G, et al.. (1995). Imprint cytology of the gallbladder mucosa. Its use in diagnosing macroscopically inapparent carcinoma.. PubMed. 39(1). 19–22.6 indexed citations
6.
Celoria, G, et al.. (1993). [Local anesthesia in anal surgery. Technical note and immediate results].. PubMed. 48(19). 1103–6.1 indexed citations
7.
Nardini, Andrea, et al.. (1993). [Subacute Budd-Chiari syndrome treated with rTPA. Considerations on a case].. PubMed. 48(19). 1129–33.1 indexed citations
8.
Celoria, G, et al.. (1992). [Idiopathic and torsion-induced omental infarct: case reports and a review of the literature].. PubMed. 12(11-12). 569–71.1 indexed citations
9.
Celoria, G, et al.. (1992). [Spigelian hernia: its echotomographic diagnosis and surgical treatment].. PubMed. 13(1-2). 29–31.3 indexed citations
10.
Celoria, G, et al.. (1992). [Acute appendicitis secondary to carcinoma of the right colon].. PubMed. 12(8-9). 446–8.1 indexed citations
Celoria, G, et al.. (1985). Colecistitis aguda y cáncer de vesícula en el anciano.
13.
Celoria, G, et al.. (1983). [Genetic analysis of the resistance to tumor development in an inbred strain of rats].. PubMed. 43(5). 502–8.5 indexed citations
14.
Celoria, G, et al.. (1979). [Influence of the antigenic differences between the tumor and the host in development of tumor enhancement in the rat].. PubMed. 38(1). 31–4.1 indexed citations
15.
Celoria, G, et al.. (1965). [Study of testicular estrogenic production in normal individuals and in patients with various alterations of the seminiferous tube].. PubMed. 12(68). 85–93.6 indexed citations
Celoria, G & Roy Β. Patton. (1959). Congenital absence of the aortic arch. American Heart Journal. 58(3). 407–413.324 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.