G. Baum

8.0k total citations
20 papers, 681 citations indexed

About

G. Baum is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Baum has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 681 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 7 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 4 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in G. Baum's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (4 papers). G. Baum is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (4 papers). G. Baum collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Japan. G. Baum's co-authors include Wilhelm Raith, M. S. Lubell, R. Ehrlich, R.H. Miller, V. W. Hughes, J.E. Clendenin, K. Kondo, K. P. Schüler, N. Sasao and M. J. Alguard and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Physical Review B.

In The Last Decade

G. Baum

20 papers receiving 641 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Baum Germany 12 376 276 63 60 53 20 681
G. Baum Germany 14 216 0.6× 305 1.1× 91 1.4× 40 0.7× 46 0.9× 28 529
W. W. Jacobs United States 15 395 1.1× 175 0.6× 142 2.3× 36 0.6× 26 0.5× 44 568
N. Kawamura Japan 10 180 0.5× 161 0.6× 116 1.8× 34 0.6× 41 0.8× 31 336
N. Bräuer Germany 13 108 0.3× 325 1.2× 51 0.8× 38 0.6× 56 1.1× 19 512
R. Sachot Switzerland 12 409 1.1× 157 0.6× 33 0.5× 131 2.2× 116 2.2× 29 681
B. Spellmeyer Germany 13 237 0.6× 211 0.8× 139 2.2× 110 1.8× 45 0.8× 46 466
W. Reichart Switzerland 14 374 1.0× 212 0.8× 112 1.8× 49 0.8× 20 0.4× 26 531
K. Nakahara Japan 13 237 0.6× 135 0.5× 139 2.2× 34 0.6× 51 1.0× 34 424
S.S. Klein Netherlands 12 327 0.9× 144 0.5× 191 3.0× 38 0.6× 68 1.3× 41 498
S. Rakers Germany 15 406 1.1× 210 0.8× 60 1.0× 12 0.2× 44 0.8× 30 557

Countries citing papers authored by G. Baum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Baum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Baum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Baum more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Baum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Baum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Baum. The network helps show where G. Baum may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Baum

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Baum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Baum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Baum. G. Baum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sun, Xu, Qiuju Li, Mitsunori Kurahashi, et al.. (2007). Spin-polarization study ofCOmolecules adsorbed onFe(110)using metastable-atom deexcitation spectroscopy and first-principles calculations. Physical Review B. 75(3). 15 indexed citations
2.
Baum, G., et al.. (2002). Oxygen adsorption on Fe/W(110) and Co/W(110) thin films: Surface magnetic properties. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 66(13). 28 indexed citations
3.
Streun, M., et al.. (1999). Role of exchange and kinematic in the generation of low-energy polarized electron pairs. Physical Review A. 59(6). R4109–R4112. 14 indexed citations
4.
Bültmann, S., G. Baum, P. Hautle, et al.. (1995). Properties of the deuterated target material used by the SMC. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 356(1). 102–105. 6 indexed citations
5.
Baum, G., et al.. (1995). Surface magnetic properties of Fe(110) and Co(0001) films. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 148(1-2). 179–180. 3 indexed citations
6.
Semertzidis, Yannis K., G. Baum, P. Berglund, et al.. (1995). Polarized targets as dark matter detectors. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 356(1). 122–123. 1 indexed citations
7.
Baum, G., M. R. Bergström, J.E. Clendenin, et al.. (1980). Measurement of Asymmetry in Spin-DependentepResonance-Region Scattering. Physical Review Letters. 45(25). 2000–2003. 51 indexed citations
8.
Baum, G., C. D. Caldwell, & Wolfgang P. Schröder. (1980). Dual-frequency optical pumping for spin-polarizing a lithium atomic beam. Applied Physics A. 21(2). 121–126. 22 indexed citations
9.
Alguard, M. J., J.E. Clendenin, R. Ehrlich, et al.. (1979). A source of highly polarized electrons at the stanford linear accelerator center. Nuclear Instruments and Methods. 163(1). 29–59. 31 indexed citations
10.
Atwood, W. B., R.L.A. Cottrell, H. DeStaebler, et al.. (1978). Search for parity violation in deep-inelastic scattering of polarized electrons by unpolarized deuterons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 18(7). 2223–2226. 6 indexed citations
11.
Alguard, M. J., W. W. Ash, G. Baum, et al.. (1978). Deep-InelasticepAsymmetry Measurements and Comparison with the Bjorken Sum Rule and Models of Proton Spin Structure. Physical Review Letters. 41(2). 70–73. 140 indexed citations
12.
Kisker, E., et al.. (1978). Electron field emission from ferromagnetic europium sulfide on tungsten. Physical review. B, Condensed matter. 18(5). 2256–2275. 81 indexed citations
13.
Alguard, M. J., G. Baum, J.E. Clendenin, et al.. (1977). Operating Experience with the Polarized Electron Gun at SLAC. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 24(3). 1603–1604. 2 indexed citations
14.
Alguard, M. J., W. W. Ash, G. Baum, et al.. (1976). Deep Inelastic Scattering of Polarized Electrons by Polarized Protons. Physical Review Letters. 37(19). 1261–1265. 162 indexed citations
15.
Baum, G., et al.. (1976). The temperature dependence of the spin polarization of field emitted electrons from a W-EuS-vacuum junction. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 3(1-2). 4–6. 2 indexed citations
16.
Raan, Anthony F. J. van, G. Baum, & Wilhelm Raith. (1976). One- and two-photon production of very highly excited states of caesium. Journal of Physics B Atomic and Molecular Physics. 9(7). L173–L176. 6 indexed citations
17.
Cooper, P. S., M. J. Alguard, R. Ehrlich, et al.. (1975). Polarized Electron-Electron Scattering at GeV Energies. Physical Review Letters. 34(25). 1589–1592. 42 indexed citations
18.
Baum, G., M. S. Lubell, & Wilhelm Raith. (1972). Measurement of the Spin-Orbit Perturbation in theP-State Continuum of Heavy Alkali-Metal Atoms: K, Rb, and Cs. Physical review. A, General physics. 5(3). 1073–1087. 53 indexed citations
19.
Baum, G. & Ueli Koch. (1969). A sources of polarized electrons. Nuclear Instruments and Methods. 71(2). 189–195. 15 indexed citations
20.
Baum, G.. (1958). [Different methods of practical application of grid irradiation].. PubMed. 107(3). 397–403. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026