Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of G. A. Dulk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. A. Dulk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. A. Dulk more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. A. Dulk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. A. Dulk. The network helps show where G. A. Dulk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. A. Dulk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. A. Dulk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. A. Dulk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. A. Dulk. G. A. Dulk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Leblanc, Y., R. J. Sault, & G. A. Dulk. (1999). Jupiter's magnetic field as revealed by the synchrotron radiation belts.. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 31(4). 1159.1 indexed citations
4.
Bolton, S. J., S. Levin, M. J. Klein, et al.. (1998). Modeling Jupiter's Synchrotron Emission. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 30. 1079.1 indexed citations
5.
Dulk, G. A., Y. Leblanc, & T. S. Bastian. (1997). Search for Cyclotron-maser Radio Emission from Extrasolar Planets.2 indexed citations
6.
Dulk, G. A., Y. Leblanc, R. J. Sault, H. P. Ladreiter, & J. E. P. Connerney. (1997). THE RADIATION BELTS OF JUPITER AT 13 AND 22 CM. II. THE ASYMMETRIES AND THE MAGNETIC FIELD. 319(1). 282–289.24 indexed citations
7.
Kesteven, M. J., R. M. Price, Imke de Pater, et al.. (1994). Jupiter and Comet 1993e. International Astronomical Union Circular. 6040. 1.1 indexed citations
8.
Winglee, R. M., et al.. (1990). Simultaneous Hard and Soft X-Ray Observations of Impulsive flares: Evidence for Acceleration by Quasi-Static Electric Fields. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 22. 899.
9.
Winglee, R. M., M. E. McKean, & G. A. Dulk. (1989). Chromospheric-coronal coupling during solar flares: Current systems and particle acceleration. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 21. 219–228.
10.
Slee, Ο. B., R. T. Stewart, Gill Nelson, et al.. (1988). Microwave Spectra and Polarization of Active Stars. 27. 247.
11.
Orrall, F. Q., C. Lindsey, D. L. Mickey, et al.. (1988). EUV and XUV Observations of the Solar Corona made in Conjunction with the Total Solar Eclipse of 1988 March 17/18. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 20. 703.1 indexed citations
Gary, Dale E., G. A. Dulk, William E. Wagner, et al.. (1980). Visible Light and Radio Observations of the First Coronal Transient Event of 1980 June 29. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 12. 904.1 indexed citations
15.
Canfield, R. C., C. C. Cheng, K. P. Dere, et al.. (1980). Radiative energy output of the 5 September 1973 flare. 451–469.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.