Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior
19991.2k citationsC. J. Murphy, G. A. Abrams et al.Biomaterialsprofile →
Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates
2003773 citationsAna I. Teixeira, G. A. Abrams et al.Journal of Cell Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of G. A. Abrams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. A. Abrams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. A. Abrams more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. A. Abrams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. A. Abrams. The network helps show where G. A. Abrams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. A. Abrams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. A. Abrams.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. A. Abrams based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. A. Abrams. G. A. Abrams is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Abrams, G. A., et al.. (2003). Differential Activation of the Small GTPase, Rho, in Corneal Epithelial Cells Plated on Nanopatterned and Smooth Substrates. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 1343–1343.2 indexed citations
Teixeira, Ana I., G. A. Abrams, Paul J. Bertics, Christopher J. Murphy, & Paul F. Nealey. (2003). Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. Journal of Cell Science. 116(10). 1881–1892.773 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Teixeira, Ana I., G. A. Abrams, Christopher J. Murphy, & Paul F. Nealey. (2003). Cell behavior on lithographically defined nanostructured substrates. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena. 21(2). 683–687.48 indexed citations
6.
Abrams, G. A., Joanne Paul‐Murphy, & Christopher J. Murphy. (2002). Conjunctivitis in birds. Veterinary Clinics of North America Exotic Animal Practice. 5(2). 287–309.6 indexed citations
Murphy, C. J., Carl F. Marfurt, Ellison Bentley, et al.. (2001). Spontaneous chronic corneal epithelial defects (SCCED) in dogs: clinical features, innervation, and effect of topical SP, with or without IGF-1.. PubMed. 42(10). 2252–61.100 indexed citations
10.
Bentley, Ellison, et al.. (2001). Morphology and immunohistochemistry of spontaneous chronic corneal epithelial defects (SCCED) in dogs.. PubMed. 42(10). 2262–9.71 indexed citations
Murphy, C. J., et al.. (1999). Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior. Biomaterials. 20(6). 573–588.1173 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.