Frida I. Piper

4.8k total citations · 2 hit papers
63 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Frida I. Piper is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Frida I. Piper has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 44 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 26 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Frida I. Piper's work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (44 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (35 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (24 papers). Frida I. Piper is often cited by papers focused on Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (44 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (35 papers) and Tree-ring climate responses (24 papers). Frida I. Piper collaborates with scholars based in Chile, Australia and Switzerland. Frida I. Piper's co-authors include Alex Fajardo, Günter Hoch, Anna Sala, Lohengrin A. Cavieres, Sara Palacio, Jordi Martínez‐Vilalta, Dolores Asensio, Lucía Galiano, Francisco Lloret and Christopher H. Lusk and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, New Phytologist and Journal of Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Frida I. Piper

59 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

Dynamics of non‐structural carbohydrates in terrestria... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2016 2010 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frida I. Piper Chile 27 2.0k 1.5k 1.1k 1.1k 311 63 2.7k
L. Turin Dickman United States 17 1.9k 1.0× 900 0.6× 915 0.9× 1.0k 1.0× 121 0.4× 29 2.3k
Lucía Galiano Spain 15 1.5k 0.8× 1.0k 0.7× 719 0.7× 920 0.9× 139 0.4× 16 2.0k
Jesús Rodríguez‐Calcerrada Spain 29 1.4k 0.7× 942 0.6× 957 0.9× 679 0.6× 167 0.5× 90 2.1k
J. A. Pardos Spain 30 1.6k 0.8× 1.5k 1.0× 1.1k 1.0× 658 0.6× 240 0.8× 64 2.5k
Guang‐You Hao China 28 1.6k 0.8× 851 0.6× 912 0.9× 919 0.9× 337 1.1× 87 2.2k
Michael J. Aspinwall United States 25 1.4k 0.7× 653 0.4× 1.1k 1.0× 520 0.5× 210 0.7× 65 2.1k
Pedro Villar‐Salvador Spain 31 1.2k 0.6× 2.0k 1.3× 1.5k 1.4× 415 0.4× 338 1.1× 93 2.8k
Lars Markesteijn United Kingdom 17 1.2k 0.6× 1.4k 0.9× 605 0.6× 411 0.4× 490 1.6× 24 2.1k
Elizabeth A. Pinkard Australia 25 1.1k 0.6× 730 0.5× 787 0.7× 465 0.4× 197 0.6× 44 1.8k
Luis Matías Spain 26 914 0.5× 1.2k 0.8× 558 0.5× 554 0.5× 399 1.3× 62 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Frida I. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frida I. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frida I. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frida I. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frida I. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frida I. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frida I. Piper. The network helps show where Frida I. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frida I. Piper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frida I. Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frida I. Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frida I. Piper. Frida I. Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Fajardo, Alex, et al.. (2025). Shining a new light on parasitic plants: resistance to invasion. New Phytologist. 247(2). 470–476.
2.
Lusk, Christopher H., Ian A. Dickie, Kathryn Allen, et al.. (2025). Soil carbon:nitrogen ratios explain successional trajectories in the mycorrhizal makeup of south‐temperate humid forests. Ecology. 106(7). e70169–e70169. 1 indexed citations
3.
Piper, Frida I. & Alex Fajardo. (2023). Carbon stress causes earlier budbreak in shade‐tolerant species and delays it in shade‐intolerant species. American Journal of Botany. 110(3). 1–11. 5 indexed citations
4.
Piper, Frida I., et al.. (2023). Microenvironment has little effect on the litter decomposition rate of temperate trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 54(1). 83–96. 1 indexed citations
5.
Piper, Frida I., et al.. (2022). Nonstructural carbohydrates predict survival in saplings of temperate trees under carbon stress. Functional Ecology. 36(11). 2806–2818. 15 indexed citations
6.
Fajardo, Alex, Frida I. Piper, & Ana I. García‐Cervigón. (2022). The intraspecific relationship between wood density, vessel diameter and other traits across environmental gradients. Functional Ecology. 36(7). 1585–1598. 17 indexed citations
7.
Piper, Frida I., et al.. (2022). Elevational variation of the seasonal dynamic of carbohydrate reserves in an alpine plant of Mediterranean mountains. Alpine Botany. 132(2). 315–327. 8 indexed citations
8.
Jiménez‐Castillo, Mylthon, et al.. (2022). No carbon shortage in declining trees of the isohydric species Araucaria araucana (Molina) K. Koch under drought. Annals of Forest Science. 79(1). 7 indexed citations
9.
Fajardo, Alex & Frida I. Piper. (2021). How to cope with drought and not die trying: Drought acclimation across tree species with contrasting niche breadth. Functional Ecology. 35(9). 1903–1913. 16 indexed citations
10.
Oliet, Juan A., et al.. (2021). Solid shelter tubes alleviate summer stresses during outplanting in drought-tolerant species of Mediterranean forests. New Forests. 53(3). 555–569. 7 indexed citations
11.
Piper, Frida I., et al.. (2021). Phenology explains different storage remobilization in two congeneric temperate tree species with contrasting leaf habit. Tree Physiology. 42(3). 501–512. 11 indexed citations
12.
Piper, Frida I.. (2020). Decoupling between growth rate and storage remobilization in broadleaf temperate tree species. Functional Ecology. 34(6). 1180–1192. 27 indexed citations
13.
Rosell, Julieta A., et al.. (2020). Inner bark as a crucial tissue for non‐structural carbohydrate storage across three tropical woody plant communities. Plant Cell & Environment. 44(1). 156–170. 44 indexed citations
14.
Hernández-Moreno, Ángela, et al.. (2019). Secondary leaves of an outbreak-adapted tree species are both more resource acquisitive and more herbivore resistant than primary leaves. Tree Physiology. 39(9). 1499–1511. 14 indexed citations
15.
Piper, Frida I., Günter Hoch, & Alex Fajardo. (2019). Revisiting the relative growth rate hypothesis for gymnosperm and angiosperm species co‐occurrence. American Journal of Botany. 106(1). 101–112. 21 indexed citations
16.
Piper, Frida I., et al.. (2019). Herbivore resistance in congeneric and sympatric Nothofagus species is not related to leaf habit. American Journal of Botany. 106(6). 788–797. 12 indexed citations
17.
Grubb, P. J., Frida I. Piper, & Peter J. Bellingham. (2017). Problems with bioclimatic definitions of vegetation types. New Zealand Journal of Botany. 55(3). 373–377. 1 indexed citations
18.
19.
Martínez‐Vilalta, Jordi, Anna Sala, Dolores Asensio, et al.. (2016). Dynamics of non‐structural carbohydrates in terrestrial plants: a global synthesis. Ecological Monographs. 86(4). 495–516. 506 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Reyes‐Díaz, Marjorie, Miren Alberdi, Frida I. Piper, León A. Bravo, & Luís J. Corcuera. (2005). Low temperature responses of Nothofagus dombeyi and Nothofagus nitida, two evergreen species from south central Chile. Tree Physiology. 25(11). 1389–1398. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026