Freya Schnabel
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Papers in
-
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 54
-
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 33
- Co-authors
- Jennifer Chun (40 shared papers)Beth Ann Ditkoff (11 shared papers)Steven M. Albert (4 shared papers)Joshua Fogel (4 shared papers)Alfred I. Neugut (4 shared papers)Mahmoud El‐Tamer (16 shared papers)Jiyon Lee (5 shared papers)Cristina M. Checka (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Breast Journal (15 papers)Annals of Surgical Oncology (10 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (8 papers)The American Journal of Surgery (7 papers)Cancer Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Freya Schnabel
107 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Cancer Research 841
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 572
- Oncology 681
- Dermatology 202
- Health 156
Countries citing papers authored by Freya Schnabel
This map shows the geographic impact of Freya Schnabel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Freya Schnabel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Freya Schnabel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Freya Schnabel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Freya Schnabel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Freya Schnabel. The network helps show where Freya Schnabel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Freya Schnabel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 308 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 179 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 167 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 157 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 108 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 94 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 83 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 81 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 75 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 63 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 52 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 48 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 47 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 47 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 40 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 39 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 37 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 35 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 33 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 31 |
About Freya Schnabel
Freya Schnabel is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology, Surgery and Genetics, having authored 114 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (54 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (33 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (23 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (19 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (18 papers), Cancer Risks and Factors (13 papers), Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (8 papers) and Cancer and Skin Lesions (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (841 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (572 citations), Oncology (681 citations), Dermatology (202 citations) and Health (156 citations). Freya Schnabel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Chun, Beth Ann Ditkoff, Steven M. Albert, Joshua Fogel, Alfred I. Neugut, Mahmoud El‐Tamer, Jiyon Lee, Cristina M. Checka, Hildegard Toth and Kathie‐Ann Joseph. Their work appears in journals such as The Breast Journal, Annals of Surgical Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, The American Journal of Surgery and Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.