Fredrick Jenet

5.3k total citations
38 papers, 888 citations indexed

About

Fredrick Jenet is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography and Aerospace Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Fredrick Jenet has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 888 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 9 papers in Oceanography and 7 papers in Aerospace Engineering. Recurrent topics in Fredrick Jenet's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (29 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (18 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (9 papers). Fredrick Jenet is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (29 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (18 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (9 papers). Fredrick Jenet collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Fredrick Jenet's co-authors include G. Hobbs, R. N. Manchester, Joseph D. Romano, A. N. Lommen, Justin A. Ellis, Xavier Siemens, Shane L. Larson, J. M. Cordes, L. Wen and D. R. B. Yardley and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and The Astrophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Fredrick Jenet

36 papers receiving 851 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fredrick Jenet United States 16 807 198 137 128 67 38 888
R. Abbott United States 11 1.1k 1.4× 132 0.7× 245 1.8× 107 0.8× 85 1.3× 14 1.2k
A. Tkachenko Belgium 26 1.7k 2.1× 56 0.3× 32 0.2× 69 0.5× 25 0.4× 93 1.8k
G. Woan United Kingdom 14 512 0.6× 126 0.6× 72 0.5× 101 0.8× 50 0.7× 45 600
S. Ballmer United States 14 728 0.9× 104 0.5× 157 1.1× 270 2.1× 153 2.3× 32 909
B. Farr United States 19 1.3k 1.6× 181 0.9× 200 1.5× 69 0.5× 94 1.4× 34 1.3k
В. С. Бескин Russia 17 1.1k 1.4× 136 0.7× 718 5.2× 114 0.9× 106 1.6× 87 1.2k
P. Fritschel United States 13 612 0.8× 65 0.3× 247 1.8× 351 2.7× 157 2.3× 23 849
R. Stanga Italy 13 420 0.5× 44 0.2× 94 0.7× 76 0.6× 83 1.2× 51 542
Daisuke Tatsumi Japan 12 896 1.1× 134 0.7× 245 1.8× 253 2.0× 200 3.0× 28 1.0k
R. P. Butler Ireland 11 806 1.0× 20 0.1× 38 0.3× 105 0.8× 30 0.4× 39 903

Countries citing papers authored by Fredrick Jenet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fredrick Jenet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fredrick Jenet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fredrick Jenet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fredrick Jenet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fredrick Jenet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fredrick Jenet. The network helps show where Fredrick Jenet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fredrick Jenet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fredrick Jenet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fredrick Jenet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fredrick Jenet. Fredrick Jenet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jenet, Fredrick, et al.. (2022). The Arecibo Observatory as an Instrument for Investigating Orbital Debris: Legacy and Next Generation Performance. The Planetary Science Journal. 3(3). 52–52. 3 indexed citations
2.
Luo, Jing, S. M. Ransom, Paul Demorest, et al.. (2020). PINT: A Modern Software Package for Pulsar Timing. arXiv (Cornell University). 231.
3.
Luo, Jing, S. M. Ransom, Paul Demorest, et al.. (2019). PINT: High-precision pulsar timing analysis package. Astrophysics Source Code Library. 3 indexed citations
4.
Yang, Yingchen, et al.. (2018). A Parametric Study of Wave Interaction With a Rotor Having Hydrofoil Blades. ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley). 1 indexed citations
5.
Antoniadis, John, D. L. Kaplan, K. Stovall, et al.. (2016). AN ECCENTRIC BINARY MILLISECOND PULSAR WITH A HELIUM WHITE DWARF COMPANION IN THE GALACTIC FIELD. The Astrophysical Journal. 830(1). 36–36. 18 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Yan, Soumya D. Mohanty, & Fredrick Jenet. (2014). A coherent method for the detection and parameter estimation of continuous gravitational wave signals using a pulsar timing array. ScholarWorks @ UTRGV (The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley). 26 indexed citations
7.
Jenet, Fredrick, et al.. (2014). BRIGHT MICROWAVE PULSES FROM PSR B0531+21 OBSERVED WITH A PROTOTYPE TRANSIENT SURVEY RECEIVER. The Astronomical Journal. 147(5). 100–100. 2 indexed citations
8.
Siemens, Xavier, Justin A. Ellis, Fredrick Jenet, & Joseph D. Romano. (2013). The stochastic background: scaling laws and time to detection for pulsar timing arrays. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 30(22). 224015–224015. 114 indexed citations
9.
Kassim, N. E., S. M. White, Paul Rodríguez, et al.. (2010). The Long Wavelength Array (LWA): A Large HF/VHF Array for Solar Physics, Ionospheric Science, and Solar Radar. amos. 1 indexed citations
10.
Yardley, D. R. B., G. Hobbs, Fredrick Jenet, et al.. (2010). The sensitivity of the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array to individual sources of gravitational waves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 407(1). 669–680. 62 indexed citations
11.
Jenet, Fredrick, et al.. (2010). A Prototype Radio Transient Survey Instrument for Piggyback Deep Space Network Tracking. Proceedings of the IEEE. 99(5). 889–894. 1 indexed citations
12.
Lee, Kejia, Fredrick Jenet, Richard H. Price, Norbert Wex, & M. Krämer. (2010). DETECTING MASSIVE GRAVITONS USING PULSAR TIMING ARRAYS. The Astrophysical Journal. 722(2). 1589–1597. 57 indexed citations
13.
Creighton, J. D. E., Fredrick Jenet, & Richard H. Price. (2009). PULSAR TIMING AND SPACETIME CURVATURE. The Astrophysical Journal. 693(2). 1113–1117. 4 indexed citations
14.
Hobbs, G., D. J. Champion, S. W. Amy, et al.. (2008). PULSE@Parkes: Pulsar Observing for High School Students. ASPC. 212. 190–196. 2 indexed citations
15.
Jenet, Fredrick, et al.. (2005). Detecting the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background Using Pulsar Timing. The Astrophysical Journal. 625(2). L123–L126. 137 indexed citations
16.
Jenet, Fredrick & S. M. Ransom. (2004). The geometry of the double-pulsar system J0737–3039 from systematic intensity variations. Nature. 428(6986). 919–921. 17 indexed citations
17.
Jenet, Fredrick, A. N. Lommen, Shane L. Larson, & L. Wen. (2004). Constraining the Properties of Supermassive Black Hole Systems Using Pulsar Timing: Application to 3C 66B. The Astrophysical Journal. 606(2). 799–803. 101 indexed citations
18.
Jenet, Fredrick & J. Gil. (2004). The Intrinsic Intensity Modulation of PSR B1937+21 at 1410 MHz. The Astrophysical Journal. 602(2). L89–L92. 5 indexed citations
19.
Jenet, Fredrick & J. Gil. (2003). Using the Intensity Modulation Index to Test Pulsar Radio Emission Models. The Astrophysical Journal. 596(2). L215–L218. 15 indexed citations
20.
Fujisawa, Go, et al.. (2002). Near-Infrared Compositional Analysis of Gas and Condensate Reservoir Fluids at Elevated Pressures and Temperatures. Applied Spectroscopy. 56(12). 1615–1620. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026