Frederick W. King
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 10%
- Applied Mathematics top 5%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- George C. SchatzRichard P. Van DuyneVictor ShoupMichael K. KellyI. PorrasD. FeldmannKenneth J. DykemaJohn Langer
- Topics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics (37 papers)Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (37 papers)Nuclear physics research studies (16 papers)
- Cited by
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and OpticsNuclear and High Energy PhysicsPhysical and Theoretical Chemistry
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSpain
In The Last Decade
Frederick W. King
71 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.0k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 275
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 244
- Applied Mathematics 161
- Materials Chemistry 149
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. King
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. King. The network helps show where Frederick W. King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick W. King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick W. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick W. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick W. King. Frederick W. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 33 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 48 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 14 |
About Frederick W. King
Frederick W. King is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Applied Mathematics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (37 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (37 papers) and Nuclear physics research studies (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.0k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (275 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (149 citations). Frederick W. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include George C. Schatz, Richard P. Van Duyne, Victor Shoup, Michael K. Kelly, I. Porras, D. Feldmann, Kenneth J. Dykema, John Langer, Stuart M. Rothstein and Scott A. Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Reviews, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.