Frederick W. B. Einstein

6.7k citations
296 papers · 5.4k indexed · h-index 35

Frederick W. B. Einstein

294 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Frederick W. B. Einstein
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Inorganic Chemistry 2.9k
  • Organic Chemistry 3.7k
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 284
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 864
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 352
Replace Max Herberhold with:
Max Herberhold Germany
Gerald Henkel Germany
Hiroshi Yamazaki Japan
Yu. T. Struchkov Russia
Nicholas J. Taylor Canada
Ivan Bernal United States
William McFarlane United Kingdom
Joachim Sieler Germany
Wolfgang Saak Germany
Luigi M. Venanzi Switzerland
Frederick W. B. Einstein relative to Max Herberhold Germany Max Herberhold's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Max Herberhold · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. B. Einstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. B. Einstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. B. Einstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. B. Einstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. B. Einstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. B. Einstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. B. Einstein. The network helps show where Frederick W. B. Einstein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick W. B. Einstein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick W. B. Einstein Line = papers co-authored together Frederick W. B. Einstein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 199522
2 199132
3 199110
4 198810
5 19876
6 198722
7 198626
8 19846
9 198432
10 198426
11 198422
12 198431
13 19833
14 198379
15 19787
16 19775
17 19774
18 197429
19 19717
20 196716

About Frederick W. B. Einstein

Frederick W. B. Einstein is a scholar working on Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 296 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (121 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (63 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (56 papers), Crystal structures of chemical compounds (47 papers), Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (37 papers), Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (33 papers), Synthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds (31 papers) and Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (2.9k citations), Organic Chemistry (3.7k citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (284 citations). Frederick W. B. Einstein has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, New Zealand and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Raymond J. Batchelor, Roland K. Pomeroy, Derek Sutton, Peter Legzdins, Walter Cullen, Anthony C. Willis, Terry Jones, B. R. Penfold, Anthony C. Willis and Dennis G. Tuck. Their work appears in journals such as Inorganic Chemistry, Organometallics, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Canadian Journal of Chemistry and Journal of Organometallic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026