Frederick Smith

517 total citations
10 papers, 199 citations indexed

About

Frederick Smith is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Hardware and Architecture and Computational Theory and Mathematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick Smith has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 199 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 9 papers in Hardware and Architecture and 4 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics. Recurrent topics in Frederick Smith's work include Logic, programming, and type systems (9 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (8 papers) and Formal Methods in Verification (4 papers). Frederick Smith is often cited by papers focused on Logic, programming, and type systems (9 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (8 papers) and Formal Methods in Verification (4 papers). Frederick Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States. Frederick Smith's co-authors include Greg Morrisett, Dan Grossman, Karl Crary, Richard J. Samuels, Steve Zdancewic, David Walker, Neal Glew, Stephanie Weirich, Kathleen Fisher and Anne Rogers and has published in prestigious journals such as ACM SIGPLAN Notices, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems and Journal of Functional Programming.

In The Last Decade

Frederick Smith

10 papers receiving 168 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Frederick Smith United States	5	166	80	71	57	38	10	199
Fergus Henderson Australia	7	223 1.3×	96 1.2×	65 0.9×	108 1.9×	39 1.0×	12	263
Sandrine Blazy France	7	253 1.5×	89 1.1×	69 1.0×	131 2.3×	49 1.3×	23	306
Josef Svenningsson Sweden	8	153 0.9×	111 1.4×	59 0.8×	74 1.3×	45 1.2×	17	211
Miguel Gómez‐Zamalloa Spain	9	120 0.7×	76 0.9×	59 0.8×	83 1.5×	66 1.7×	25	213
William R. Bevier United States	7	165 1.0×	96 1.2×	81 1.1×	96 1.7×	18 0.5×	9	219
Jieung Kim United States	6	154 0.9×	68 0.8×	101 1.4×	47 0.8×	34 0.9×	15	205
Dominic P. Mulligan United Kingdom	9	148 0.9×	68 0.8×	74 1.0×	55 1.0×	48 1.3×	24	214
Chrislain Razafimahefa Switzerland	3	171 1.0×	67 0.8×	49 0.7×	37 0.6×	126 3.3×	4	248
Tommy Thorn France	6	140 0.8×	29 0.4×	98 1.4×	36 0.6×	40 1.1×	6	209
Tom Ridge United Kingdom	6	126 0.8×	108 1.4×	117 1.6×	35 0.6×	25 0.7×	11	199

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Smith. The network helps show where Frederick Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick Smith. Frederick Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Cortes, Corinna, Kathleen Fisher, Daryl Pregibon, Anne Rogers, & Frederick Smith. (2004). Hancock. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems. 26(2). 301–338. 16 indexed citations

2.

Smith, Frederick, Dan Grossman, Greg Morrisett, Luke Hornof, & Trevor Jim. (2003). Compiling for template-based run-time code generation. Journal of Functional Programming. 13(3). 677–708. 17 indexed citations

3.

Smith, Frederick, et al.. (2002). Certified run-time code generation. 3 indexed citations

4.

Smith, Frederick, Dan Grossman, Greg Morrisett, Luke Hornof, & Trevor Jim. (2000). Compiling for Runtime Code Generation. C3–C3. 3 indexed citations

5.

Smith, Frederick, Dan Grossman, Greg Morrisett, Luke Hornof, & Trevor Jim. (2000). Compiling for Runtime Code Generation (Extended Version). eCommons (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations

6.

Bonachea, Dan, Kathleen Fisher, Anne Rogers, & Frederick Smith. (1999). Hancock. 163–176. 12 indexed citations

7.

Morrisett, Greg, Karl Crary, Neal Glew, et al.. (1999). TALx86: A Realistic Typed Assembly Language∗. 114 indexed citations

8.

Smith, Frederick & Greg Morrisett. (1998). Comparing mostly-copying and mark-sweep conservative collection. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 34(3). 68–78. 2 indexed citations

9.

Smith, Frederick & Greg Morrisett. (1998). Comparing mostly-copying and mark-sweep conservative collection. 68–78. 26 indexed citations

10.

Smith, Frederick & Greg Morrisett. (1997). Mostly-Copying Collection: A Viable Alternative to Conservative Mark-Sweep. eCommons (Cornell University). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact