Frederick L. Cone

560 total citations
8 papers, 421 citations indexed

About

Frederick L. Cone is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Genetics and Microbiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick L. Cone has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 421 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 2 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Microbiology. Recurrent topics in Frederick L. Cone's work include Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers) and Reproductive tract infections research (2 papers). Frederick L. Cone is often cited by papers focused on Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (2 papers) and Reproductive tract infections research (2 papers). Frederick L. Cone collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frederick L. Cone's co-authors include David Upmalis, Lynn Bradley, Rogerio A. Løbo, Michelle P. Warren, E. Dowling, Michael E. Kafrissen, Kathleen McIntyre‐Seltman, George W. Creasy, David F. Archer and Donald M. Broverman and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Frederick L. Cone

8 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frederick L. Cone United States 7 209 207 200 91 74 8 421
Lynn Bradley New Zealand 6 208 1.0× 159 0.8× 156 0.8× 3 0.0× 16 0.2× 8 315
Deepika Garg United States 9 33 0.2× 52 0.3× 57 0.3× 37 0.4× 237 3.2× 18 394
Juliana Risso Pariz Brazil 9 25 0.1× 71 0.3× 29 0.1× 34 0.4× 275 3.7× 17 415
MERRITT R. CALLANTINE United States 10 33 0.2× 145 0.7× 228 1.1× 11 0.1× 96 1.3× 16 405
Elizabeth A. Kennard United States 9 16 0.1× 49 0.2× 67 0.3× 72 0.8× 343 4.6× 13 582
Justin Chosich United States 11 16 0.1× 93 0.4× 53 0.3× 16 0.2× 136 1.8× 18 297
V. L. Beach United States 12 21 0.1× 55 0.3× 72 0.4× 10 0.1× 24 0.3× 21 517
DIANA JUCHTER United States 11 20 0.1× 204 1.0× 180 0.9× 13 0.1× 114 1.5× 14 468
Osamu Takaoka Japan 7 28 0.1× 29 0.1× 57 0.3× 140 1.5× 203 2.7× 16 285
Laurence C. Udoff United States 10 27 0.1× 89 0.4× 108 0.5× 56 0.6× 200 2.7× 23 471

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick L. Cone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick L. Cone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick L. Cone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick L. Cone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick L. Cone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick L. Cone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick L. Cone. The network helps show where Frederick L. Cone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick L. Cone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick L. Cone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick L. Cone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick L. Cone. Frederick L. Cone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Roy, Partha Pratim, et al.. (2002). Bioavailability Study of a 1200 mg Miconazole Nitrate Vaginal Ovule in Healthy Female Adults. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 42(1). 52–60. 8 indexed citations
2.
Upmalis, David, et al.. (2000). Vasomotor Symptom Relief by Soy Isoflavone Extract Tablets in Postmenopausal Women. Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society. 7(4). 236–242. 241 indexed citations
3.
Upmalis, David, et al.. (2000). Single-Dose Miconazole Nitrate Vaginal Ovule in the Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis: Two Single-Blind, Controlled Studies Versus Miconazole Nitrate 100 mg Cream for 7 Days. Journal of Women s Health & Gender-Based Medicine. 9(4). 421–429. 9 indexed citations
4.
Upmalis, David, et al.. (1998). A new formulation of miconazole nitrate in the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Advances in Therapy. 15(1). 14–22. 2 indexed citations
5.
Archer, D.F., Kathleen McIntyre‐Seltman, E. Dowling, et al.. (1992). 91257926 Endometrial morphology in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Maturitas. 14(3). 246–246. 6 indexed citations
6.
Archer, David F., Kathleen McIntyre‐Seltman, E. Dowling, et al.. (1991). Endometrial morphology in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 165(2). 317–322. 107 indexed citations
7.
Klaiber, Edward L., Donald M. Broverman, William Vogel, Guy E. Abraham, & Frederick L. Cone. (1971). Effects of Infused Testosterone on Mental Performances and Serum LH. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 32(3). 341–349. 34 indexed citations
8.
Vogel, W. Bruce, Donald M. Broverman, Edward L. Klaiber, Guy E. Abraham, & Frederick L. Cone. (1971). Effects of testosterone infusions upon EEGs of normal male adults. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 31(4). 400–403. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026