Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick E. Petry
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick E. Petry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick E. Petry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick E. Petry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick E. Petry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick E. Petry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick E. Petry. The network helps show where Frederick E. Petry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick E. Petry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick E. Petry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick E. Petry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick E. Petry. Frederick E. Petry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Petry, Frederick E., et al.. (2010). Building content dictionaries for geometric algebra in OpenMath format. Journal of computing sciences in colleges. 25(4). 22–29.
6.
Beaubouef, Theresa & Frederick E. Petry. (2007). Attribute-Oriented Knowledge Discovery in Rough Relational Databases.. The Florida AI Research Society. 507–508.2 indexed citations
7.
Petry, Frederick E., et al.. (2006). Fuzzy component based object detection. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 45(3). 546–563.5 indexed citations
8.
Ladner, Roy & Frederick E. Petry. (2005). Net-Centric Approaches to Intelligence and National Security (Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science). Springer eBooks.3 indexed citations
9.
Petry, Frederick E., et al.. (2004). IMPACT OF FUNDAMENTAL CONTACT MECHANICS ON DEVELOPMENT.1 indexed citations
Perrin, Patrick & Frederick E. Petry. (1998). Contextual Text Representation for Unsupervised Discovery in Texts. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 246–257.2 indexed citations
Petry, Frederick E.. (1995). Advances in databases and artificial intelligence. JAI Press eBooks.3 indexed citations
14.
Petry, Frederick E., et al.. (1995). Solving Complex Problems with Genetic Algorithms. international conference on Genetic algorithms. 264–270.1 indexed citations
Petry, Frederick E.. (1993). Fuzzy Information Retrieval Using Genetic Algorithms and Relevance Feedback.. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. 30.20 indexed citations
Yazıcı, Adnan, R. George, Bill P. Buckles, & Frederick E. Petry. (1992). A survey of conceptual and logical data models for uncertainty management. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks. 607–643.17 indexed citations
20.
Petry, Frederick E., et al.. (1991). Object-Oriented Databases. IEEE Computer Society Press eBooks.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.