Frederick E. Below

5.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
100 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Frederick E. Below is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick E. Below has authored 100 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 82 papers in Plant Science, 65 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 18 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in Frederick E. Below's work include Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (58 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (29 papers) and Genetics and Plant Breeding (22 papers). Frederick E. Below is often cited by papers focused on Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (58 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (29 papers) and Genetics and Plant Breeding (22 papers). Frederick E. Below collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Brazil. Frederick E. Below's co-authors include Jason W. Haegele, Ross Bender, Matías L. Ruffo, Richard H. Hageman, Juliann R. Seebauer, Steven J. Crafts‐Brandner, M. Uribelarrea, James S. Schepers, D. D. Francis and Merle F. Vigil and has published in prestigious journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Journal of Experimental Botany and Soil Science Society of America Journal.

In The Last Decade

Frederick E. Below

99 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Hit Papers

Nutrient Uptake, Partitioning, and Remobilization in Mode... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frederick E. Below United States 35 3.1k 1.8k 907 375 284 100 3.9k
Shuting Dong China 42 3.4k 1.1× 2.1k 1.2× 1.1k 1.3× 402 1.1× 195 0.7× 185 4.6k
Donald L. Wyse United States 37 2.4k 0.8× 1.3k 0.7× 561 0.6× 539 1.4× 372 1.3× 153 3.7k
Peng Liu China 33 2.8k 0.9× 1.4k 0.8× 968 1.1× 281 0.7× 183 0.6× 196 3.6k
William E. May Canada 32 1.7k 0.6× 1.2k 0.6× 836 0.9× 394 1.1× 242 0.9× 119 2.6k
John T. O’Donovan Canada 39 3.8k 1.2× 2.2k 1.2× 1.3k 1.4× 690 1.8× 376 1.3× 175 4.9k
Kristian Thorup‐Kristensen Denmark 38 3.0k 1.0× 1.7k 0.9× 2.1k 2.3× 331 0.9× 490 1.7× 160 4.6k
Glenn McDonald Australia 35 3.4k 1.1× 698 0.4× 830 0.9× 277 0.7× 131 0.5× 87 4.1k
Malcolm J. Morrison Canada 30 2.8k 0.9× 1.1k 0.6× 901 1.0× 614 1.6× 290 1.0× 102 4.0k
K. Neil Harker Canada 39 4.5k 1.4× 2.2k 1.2× 1.3k 1.4× 914 2.4× 436 1.5× 219 5.6k
Marla S. McIntosh United States 22 1.8k 0.6× 777 0.4× 665 0.7× 369 1.0× 382 1.3× 62 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick E. Below

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick E. Below's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick E. Below with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick E. Below more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick E. Below

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick E. Below. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick E. Below. The network helps show where Frederick E. Below may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick E. Below

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick E. Below. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick E. Below based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick E. Below. Frederick E. Below is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Seebauer, Juliann R., et al.. (2025). Biostimulant or biological? The complexity of defining, categorizing, and regulating microbial inoculants. Agricultural & Environmental Letters. 10(2). 2 indexed citations
2.
Kent, Angela D., et al.. (2024). Long‐term continuous maize: Impacts on the soil microbiome and implications for residue management. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 88(4). 1109–1126. 3 indexed citations
3.
Seebauer, Juliann R., et al.. (2024). Soil inoculation with nitrogen‐fixing bacteria to supplement maize fertilizer need. Agronomy Journal. 117(1). 1 indexed citations
4.
Seebauer, Juliann R., et al.. (2021). Plant Biostimulants: A Categorical Review, Their Implications for Row Crop Production, and Relation to Soil Health Indicators. Agronomy. 11(7). 1297–1297. 117 indexed citations
5.
Below, Frederick E., et al.. (2020). Plant population and row spacing effects on corn: Phenotypic traits of positive yield‐responsive hybrids. Agronomy Journal. 112(3). 1589–1600. 24 indexed citations
6.
Seebauer, Juliann R., et al.. (2019). Weather During Key Growth Stages Explains Grain Quality and Yield of Maize. Agronomy. 9(1). 16–16. 48 indexed citations
7.
Haegele, Jason W., et al.. (2018). Yield Stability Differs in Commercial Maize Hybrids in Response to Changes in Plant Density, Nitrogen Fertility, and Environment. Crop Science. 58(1). 230–241. 34 indexed citations
8.
Seebauer, Juliann R. & Frederick E. Below. (2017). Use of In Vitro Kernel Culture to Study Maize Nitrogen and Carbohydrate Metabolism. Methods in molecular biology. 1676. 3–13. 2 indexed citations
9.
Bender, Ross, Jason W. Haegele, & Frederick E. Below. (2015). Modern soybean varieties' nutrient uptake patterns.. Better crops with plant food. 99(2). 7–10. 2 indexed citations
10.
Bender, Ross, Jason W. Haegele, Matías L. Ruffo, & Frederick E. Below. (2013). Modern corn hybrids' nutrient uptake patterns.. Better crops with plant food. 97(1). 7–10. 31 indexed citations
11.
Moose, Stephen P., et al.. (2012). The sugar, biomass and biofuel potential of temperate by tropical maize hybrids. GCB Bioenergy. 4(5). 496–508. 12 indexed citations
12.
Mumera, L. M. & Frederick E. Below. (1996). Genotypic variation in resistance to Striga parasitism of maize. Maydica. 41(4). 255–262. 3 indexed citations
13.
Gentry, Lowell E. & Frederick E. Below. (1993). Maize Productivity as Influenced by Form and Availability of Nitrogen. Crop Science. 33(3). 491–497. 19 indexed citations
14.
Below, Frederick E., et al.. (1990). Influence of heterotic pattern on nitrogen use and yield of maize.. Maydica. 35(3). 209–213. 13 indexed citations
15.
Below, Frederick E., et al.. (1987). Effect of Head Removal on Leaf Senescence of Sunflower. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 83(4). 844–848. 18 indexed citations
17.
Crafts‐Brandner, Steven J., Frederick E. Below, J. E. Harper, & R. H. Hageman. (1984). Effects of Pod Removal on Metabolism and Senescence of Nodulating and Nonnodulating Soybean Isolines. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 75(2). 311–317. 34 indexed citations
18.
Crafts‐Brandner, Steven J., Frederick E. Below, James E. Harper, & Richard H. Hageman. (1983). Metabolism of Carbon and Nitrogen by Soybean Seedlings in Response to Vegetative Apex Removal. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 73(1). 6–10. 10 indexed citations
19.
Below, Frederick E., et al.. (1982). Interaction of Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism in the Productivity of Maize. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 70(4). 1185–1190. 97 indexed citations
20.
Reed, Andrew J., Frederick E. Below, & Richard H. Hageman. (1980). Grain Protein Accumulation and the Relationship between Leaf Nitrate Reductase and Protease Activities during Grain Development in Maize (Zea mays L.). PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 66(1). 164–170. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026