Frédérick de Meyer

28 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Frédérick de Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 26
  • Molecular Biology 624
  • Catalysis 60
  • Mechanical Engineering 263
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 211
Replace Matthew T. Stone with:
Matthew T. Stone United States
Andrey I. Frolov Germany
Sudip Chakraborty India
Younhee Cho United States
Xinfeng Gao United States
Seifollah Jalili Iran
Thomas Beneyton France
Mine Yurtsever Türkiye
Florian Evers Germany
Haisheng Ren China
Frédérick de Meyer relative to Matthew T. Stone United States Matthew T. Stone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.0×
Matthew T. Stone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédérick de Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédérick de Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédérick de Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédérick de Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédérick de Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédérick de Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédérick de Meyer. The network helps show where Frédérick de Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frédérick de Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédérick de Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Frédérick de Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009360
2 2008150
3 201096
4 202174
5 201272
6 201064
7 202240
8 202231
9 202229
10 202128
11 202127
12 202121
13 202119
14 200915
15 202310
16 202210
17 20219
18 20239
19 20238
20 20237

About Frédérick de Meyer

Frédérick de Meyer is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Catalysis, Mechanical Engineering, Filtration and Separation and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (18 papers), Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics (15 papers), Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (11 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (6 papers), Industrial Gas Emission Control (4 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (4 papers) and Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Process Chemistry and Technology (26 citations), Molecular Biology (624 citations), Catalysis (60 citations), Mechanical Engineering (263 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (211 citations). Frédérick de Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Berend Smit, Jocelyn M. Rodgers, Maddalena Venturoli, Christophe Coquelet, Xavier Rozanska, Thomas Willems, Stéphane Jouenne, Jesper Givskov Sørensen, E. Wimmer and Birgit Schiøtt. Their work appears in journals such as Fluid Phase Equilibria, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Chemical Engineering Journal and Biophysical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026