Frederick Boltz

3.9k total citations
19 papers, 830 citations indexed

About

Frederick Boltz is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change and Ocean Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick Boltz has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 830 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 7 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 5 papers in Ocean Engineering. Recurrent topics in Frederick Boltz's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers), Forest Management and Policy (6 papers) and Water resources management and optimization (5 papers). Frederick Boltz is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers), Forest Management and Policy (6 papers) and Water resources management and optimization (5 papers). Frederick Boltz collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frederick Boltz's co-authors include Thomas P. Holmes, Douglas R. Carter, Geoffrey M. Blate, J. Zweede, Paulo Barreto, Jonah Busch, Ruben N. Lubowski, Casey Brown, Sarah Freeman and John Matthews and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and PLoS Biology.

In The Last Decade

Frederick Boltz

19 papers receiving 742 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frederick Boltz United States 13 504 232 139 120 115 19 830
Darran King Australia 21 482 1.0× 201 0.9× 161 1.2× 150 1.3× 79 0.7× 31 1.1k
Martin Nolan Australia 16 443 0.9× 233 1.0× 182 1.3× 118 1.0× 86 0.7× 30 1.0k
Rüdiger Schaldach Germany 19 525 1.0× 126 0.5× 145 1.0× 90 0.8× 70 0.6× 42 1.2k
Thomas O. Ochuodho United States 13 470 0.9× 294 1.3× 115 0.8× 40 0.3× 56 0.5× 43 822
M. van Eupen Netherlands 16 608 1.2× 91 0.4× 73 0.5× 34 0.3× 84 0.7× 44 1.1k
Christian Langpap United States 19 447 0.9× 584 2.5× 96 0.7× 102 0.8× 106 0.9× 40 1.1k
Colin Price United Kingdom 17 570 1.1× 620 2.7× 40 0.3× 32 0.3× 149 1.3× 96 1.1k
Ram Ranjan Australia 15 178 0.4× 108 0.5× 77 0.6× 133 1.1× 42 0.4× 70 629
Nir Becker Israel 21 234 0.5× 301 1.3× 269 1.9× 254 2.1× 61 0.5× 86 1.2k
Wei Hong China 15 304 0.6× 121 0.5× 54 0.4× 21 0.2× 130 1.1× 57 698

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Boltz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Boltz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Boltz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Boltz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Boltz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Boltz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Boltz. The network helps show where Frederick Boltz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick Boltz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick Boltz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick Boltz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick Boltz. Frederick Boltz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Freeman, Sarah, Casey Brown, Verónica Martínez Ferreras, et al.. (2020). Resilience by design in Mexico City: A participatory human-hydrologic systems approach. 9. 100053–100053. 24 indexed citations
2.
Voisin, Nathalie, Vincent Tidwell, Michael Kintner‐Meyer, & Frederick Boltz. (2019). Planning for sustained water-electricity resilience over the U.S.: Persistence of current water-electricity operations and long-term transformative plans. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 7. 100035–100035. 18 indexed citations
3.
Brown, Casey, et al.. (2019). Resilience by design: A deep uncertainty approach for water systems in a changing world. 9. 100051–100051. 41 indexed citations
4.
Boltz, Frederick, N. LeRoy Poff, Carl Folke, et al.. (2019). Water is a master variable: Solving for resilience in the modern era. 8. 100048–100048. 55 indexed citations
5.
Garrick, Dustin, Jim W. Hall, Andrew P. Dobson, et al.. (2017). Valuing water for sustainable development. Science. 358(6366). 1003–1005. 153 indexed citations
6.
Matthews, John & Frederick Boltz. (2012). The Shifting Boundaries of Sustainability Science: Are We Doomed Yet?. PLoS Biology. 10(6). e1001344–e1001344. 17 indexed citations
7.
Scarano, Fábio Rúbio, et al.. (2012). Brazil on the spot: Rio+20, sustainability and a role for science. Revista Brasileira de Botânica. 35(2). 233–239. 3 indexed citations
8.
Busch, Jonah, Ruben N. Lubowski, Marc K. Steininger, et al.. (2012). Structuring economic incentives to reduce emissions from deforestation within Indonesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(4). 1062–1067. 97 indexed citations
9.
Ash, Neville, et al.. (2011). The Wealth of Nature: Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity, and Human Well-Being. 10 indexed citations
10.
Cattaneo, Andrea, et al.. (2010). On international equity in reducing emissions from deforestation. Environmental Science & Policy. 13(8). 742–753. 37 indexed citations
11.
Busch, Jonah, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Andrea Cattaneo, et al.. (2009). Collaborative modeling initiative on REDD economics. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science. 6(25). 252019–252019. 3 indexed citations
12.
Busch, Jonah, Bernardo B. N. Strassburg, Andrea Cattaneo, et al.. (2009). Comparing climate and cost impacts of reference levels for reducing emissions from deforestation. Environmental Research Letters. 4(4). 44006–44006. 79 indexed citations
13.
Mittermeier, R. A., et al.. (2008). A climate for life: meeting the global challenge.. 5 indexed citations
14.
Boltz, Frederick & Douglas R. Carter. (2006). Multinomial logit estimation of a matrix growth model for tropical dry forests of eastern Bolivia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 36(10). 2623–2632. 12 indexed citations
15.
Boltz, Frederick, Thomas P. Holmes, & Douglas R. Carter. (2003). Economic and environmental impacts of conventional and reduced-impact logging in Tropical South America: a comparative review. Forest Policy and Economics. 5(1). 69–81. 50 indexed citations
16.
Boltz, Frederick, et al.. (2002). Shadow pricing diversity in U. S. national forests. Journal of Forest Economics. 8(3). 185–197. 9 indexed citations
17.
Holmes, Thomas P., et al.. (2002). Financial and ecological indicators of reduced impact logging performance in the eastern Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management. 163(1-3). 93–110. 183 indexed citations
18.
Boltz, Frederick, Douglas R. Carter, Thomas P. Holmes, & Rodrigo Moura Pereira. (2001). Financial returns under uncertainty for conventional and reduced-impact logging in permanent production forests of the Brazilian Amazon. Ecological Economics. 39(3). 387–398. 29 indexed citations
19.
Holmes, Thomas P., Frederick Boltz, & Douglas R. Carter. (2001). Financial Indicators of Reduced Impact Logging Performance in Brazil: Case Study Comparisons. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026