Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Measurement of non-circular home range
1969594 citationsRobert I. Jennrich, Frederick B. Turnerprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick B. Turner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick B. Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick B. Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick B. Turner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick B. Turner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick B. Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick B. Turner. The network helps show where Frederick B. Turner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick B. Turner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick B. Turner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick B. Turner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick B. Turner. Frederick B. Turner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hunter, Richard B., et al.. (1987). Effects of land clearing on bordering winter annual populations in the Mohave Desert. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 47(2). 8.6 indexed citations
2.
Turner, Frederick B., et al.. (1986). THE APPLICATION OF HABITAT MODELING TO THE DESERT TORTOISE (GOPHERUS AGASSIZII). Herpetologica. 42(1). 134–138.4 indexed citations
3.
Medica, Philip A. & Frederick B. Turner. (1984). Natural longevity of lizards in southern Nevada. Herpetological review. 15(2). 34–35.1 indexed citations
Turner, Frederick B., et al.. (1974). Rock Valley Validation Site. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University).1 indexed citations
9.
Turner, Frederick B., Philip A. Medica, & Donald D. Smith. (1973). Reproduction and Survivorship of the Lizard, Uta Stansburiana, and the Effects of Winter Rainfall, Density and Predation on these Processes. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 117–128.12 indexed citations
Turner, Frederick B., et al.. (1971). OBSERVATIONS OF LIZARDS AND TREE FROGS IN AN IRRADIATED PUERTO RICAN FOREST.. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).13 indexed citations
13.
Turner, Frederick B., et al.. (1971). Radiation-induced sterility in natural populations of lizards (Crotaphytus wislizenii and Cnemidophorus tigris). OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).8 indexed citations
14.
Turner, Frederick B., et al.. (1969). Density and composition of fenced populations of leopard lizards (Crotaphytus wislizenii) in southern Nevada. Herpetologica. 25. 247–257.29 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.