Frederick A. Dick
Impact in
- Oncology top 1%
- Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments
Papers in ⓘ
- Oncology 52
- Cancer-related Molecular Pathways 48
-
- Ocular Oncology and Treatments 13
- Co-authors
- Seth M. Rubin (5 shared papers)Nicholas J. Dyson (10 shared papers)Matthew J. Cecchini (17 shared papers)Bernard L. Trumpower (6 shared papers)Nick Dyson (3 shared papers)Srikanth Talluri (9 shared papers)Dominic Eisinger (3 shared papers)Julien Sage (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Molecular and Cellular Biology (13 papers)Journal of Virology (5 papers)Journal of Biological Chemistry (4 papers)Cell Division (4 papers)Cell Cycle (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Frederick A. Dick
75 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Oncology 1.7k
- Ophthalmology 363
- Molecular Biology 2.7k
- Cell Biology 502
- Cancer Research 429
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick A. Dick
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick A. Dick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick A. Dick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick A. Dick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick A. Dick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick A. Dick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick A. Dick. The network helps show where Frederick A. Dick may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick A. Dick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Molecular mechanisms underlying RB protein function Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 421 |
| 2 | 2012 | 214 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 205 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 156 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 141 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 127 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 125 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 125 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 108 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 105 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 103 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 102 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 98 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 89 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 76 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 66 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 65 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 63 | |
| 19 | 2007 | 62 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 60 |
About Frederick A. Dick
Frederick A. Dick is a scholar working on Oncology, Ophthalmology, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Cancer Research, having authored 76 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (48 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (16 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (13 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (13 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (10 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (9 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (8 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (1.7k citations), Ophthalmology (363 citations), Molecular Biology (2.7k citations), Cell Biology (502 citations) and Cancer Research (429 citations). Frederick A. Dick has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Seth M. Rubin, Nicholas J. Dyson, Matthew J. Cecchini, Bernard L. Trumpower, Nick Dyson, Srikanth Talluri, Dominic Eisinger, Julien Sage, Nathalie G. Bérubé and James I. MacDonald. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular and Cellular Biology, Journal of Virology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Cell Division and Cell Cycle.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.