Frederick A. DeClement

728 citations
23 papers · 524 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Wound Healing and Treatments 10
    • Surgical Sutures and Adhesives 4
    • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 4
    • Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques 2

Frederick A. DeClement

23 papers receiving 479 citations

Peers

Frederick A. DeClement
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Rehabilitation 355
  • Dermatology 79
  • Occupational Therapy 32
  • Biomaterials 86
  • Biochemistry 34
Replace Shihui Zhu with:
Shihui Zhu China
Moustafa Elmasry Sweden
Giovanna Martinelli Italy
B Campanati Italy
Jens Rothenberger Germany
David W. Voigt United States
Fuat Yüksel Türkiye
André Oliveira Paggiaro Brazil
Tania C.S. Cubison United Kingdom
Muhitdin Eski Türkiye
Frederick A. DeClement relative to Shihui Zhu China Shihui Zhu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.5×
Shihui Zhu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick A. DeClement

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick A. DeClement's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick A. DeClement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick A. DeClement more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick A. DeClement

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick A. DeClement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick A. DeClement. The network helps show where Frederick A. DeClement may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick A. DeClement, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick A. DeClement Line = papers co-authored together Frederick A. DeClement links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003250
2 199554
3 198744
4 198133
5 198021
6 199613
7 198213
8 198113
9 197812
10 198111
11 198010
12 19859
13 19848
14 19857
15 19847
16 19816
17 19983
18 19833
19 19962
20 19802

About Frederick A. DeClement

Frederick A. DeClement is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Surgery, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 23 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (10 papers), Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (4 papers), Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (4 papers), Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (4 papers), Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques (2 papers), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (355 citations), Dermatology (79 citations), Occupational Therapy (32 citations), Biomaterials (86 citations) and Biochemistry (34 citations). Frederick A. DeClement has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include S. Randolph May, Jeffrey R. Saffle, Marion H. Jordan, Alan R. Dimick, Glenn D. Warden, David W. Voigt, Colleen M. Ryan, William L. Hickerson, David M. Heimbach and Arnold Luterman. Their work appears in journals such as Burns, Cryobiology, Journal of Clinical Immunology, Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation and PubMed.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact