Frédéric Laville

73 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers

Frédéric Laville
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Speech and Hearing 122
  • Otorhinolaryngology 54
  • Sensory Systems 49
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 194
  • Signal Processing 101
Replace Elliott H. Berger with:
Elliott H. Berger United States
Nicola Prodi Italy
Monica S. Hammer United States
Ryota Shimokura Japan
Richard L. McKinley United States
Charles W. Rice United Kingdom
Yoshiharu Soeta Japan
Won Joon Song South Korea
Kenji Kurakata Japan
Florian Wolters Germany
Frédéric Laville relative to Elliott H. Berger United States Elliott H. Berger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Elliott H. Berger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frédéric Laville

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frédéric Laville's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédéric Laville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédéric Laville more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frédéric Laville

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédéric Laville. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédéric Laville. The network helps show where Frédéric Laville may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Frédéric Laville, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frédéric Laville Line = papers co-authored together Frédéric Laville links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201147
2 200937
3 201433
4 200020
5 200019
6 199116
7 200016
8 201416
9 201413
10
Expandable earplug with smart custom fitting capabilities
200211
11 201411
12 201511
13 201610
14 199510
15 200010
16 20158
17 20098
18 20138
19
New method and device for customizing in situ a hearing protector
20047
20 20097

About Frédéric Laville

Frédéric Laville is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Speech and Hearing and Signal Processing, having authored 80 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (27 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (21 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (17 papers), Noise Effects and Management (16 papers), Speech and Audio Processing (15 papers), Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control (10 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (9 papers) and Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (122 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (54 citations), Sensory Systems (49 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (194 citations) and Signal Processing (101 citations). Frédéric Laville has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Tunisia. Frequent co-authors include Jérémie Voix, Franck Sgard, Hugues Nélisse, Yvan Petit, Olivier Doutres, Matthew J. Miller, Alain Berry, W. Soedel, Marc Thomas and Jean Nicolas. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Applied Acoustics, Journal of Sound and Vibration, Noise and Health and Canadian acoustics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact