Fred Bernard

1.2k total citations
23 papers, 877 citations indexed

About

Fred Bernard is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Fred Bernard has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 877 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Molecular Biology, 13 papers in Cell Biology and 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Fred Bernard's work include Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (11 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (11 papers) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (5 papers). Fred Bernard is often cited by papers focused on Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (11 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (11 papers) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (5 papers). Fred Bernard collaborates with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Fred Bernard's co-authors include Sarah J. Bray, Alena Krejčı́, Benjamin E. Housden, Antoine Guichet, Joël Silber, Alexis Lalouette, Michael B. O’Connor, L Gilbert, Chantal Dauphin‐Villemant and Jean-Philippe Parvy and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, The Journal of Cell Biology and The EMBO Journal.

In The Last Decade

Fred Bernard

22 papers receiving 873 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fred Bernard France 16 639 234 221 139 122 23 877
Fernando Roch France 14 594 0.9× 253 1.1× 252 1.1× 174 1.3× 119 1.0× 21 849
Barry Denholm United Kingdom 15 468 0.7× 240 1.0× 237 1.1× 126 0.9× 145 1.2× 27 837
Jianwu Bai United States 9 604 0.9× 343 1.5× 258 1.2× 120 0.9× 147 1.2× 10 919
Cecilia D’Alterio United States 8 421 0.7× 156 0.7× 99 0.4× 161 1.2× 90 0.7× 10 741
Marc Amoyel United States 15 675 1.1× 211 0.9× 355 1.6× 246 1.8× 108 0.9× 23 990
Jian-Quan Ni United States 6 761 1.2× 322 1.4× 179 0.8× 198 1.4× 152 1.2× 6 1.1k
Maria Sol Flaherty United States 12 502 0.8× 236 1.0× 208 0.9× 354 2.5× 122 1.0× 12 833
Anja C. Nagel Germany 19 800 1.3× 230 1.0× 168 0.8× 153 1.1× 110 0.9× 61 957
Tapio I. Heino Finland 18 359 0.6× 334 1.4× 241 1.1× 134 1.0× 120 1.0× 37 832
Bruno Hudry France 18 596 0.9× 270 1.2× 89 0.4× 182 1.3× 217 1.8× 29 961

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Bernard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Bernard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Bernard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Bernard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Bernard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Bernard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Bernard. The network helps show where Fred Bernard may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fred Bernard

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fred Bernard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fred Bernard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fred Bernard. Fred Bernard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lepesant, Jean‐Antoine, et al.. (2024). The Importance of the Position of the Nucleus in Drosophila Oocyte Development. Cells. 13(2). 201–201.
2.
Bernard, Fred, et al.. (2023). Kinesin-1 promotes centrosome clustering and nuclear migration in the Drosophila oocyte. Development. 150(13). 1 indexed citations
3.
Zhu, Zihan, et al.. (2023). Multifaceted modes of γ-tubulin complex recruitment and microtubule nucleation at mitotic centrosomes. The Journal of Cell Biology. 222(10). 8 indexed citations
4.
Bernard, Fred, et al.. (2021). Autoinhibition of Cnn binding to γ-TuRCs prevents ectopic microtubule nucleation and cell division defects. The Journal of Cell Biology. 220(8). 16 indexed citations
5.
Bernard, Fred, et al.. (2021). GFP-Tagged Protein Detection by Electron Microscopy Using a GBP-APEX Tool in Drosophila. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 9. 719582–719582. 2 indexed citations
6.
Guichet, Antoine, et al.. (2021). Nuclear Migration in the <em>Drosophila</em> Oocyte. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 1 indexed citations
7.
Mukherjee, Amrita, Paul Brooks, Fred Bernard, Antoine Guichet, & Paul T. Conduit. (2020). Microtubules originate asymmetrically at the somatic golgi and are guided via Kinesin2 to maintain polarity within neurons. eLife. 9. 30 indexed citations
8.
Lepesant, Jean‐Antoine, Fred Bernard, Floris Bosveld, et al.. (2017). Distinct molecular cues ensure a robust microtubule-dependent nuclear positioning in the Drosophila oocyte. Nature Communications. 8(1). 15168–15168. 18 indexed citations
9.
Couturier, Lydie, et al.. (2017). Regulation of cortical stability by RhoGEF3 in mitotic sensory organ precursor cells inDrosophila. Biology Open. 6(12). 1851–1860. 8 indexed citations
10.
Ferrara, Maria Antonietta, Giovanna Sessa, Mario Fiore, et al.. (2017). Small molecules targeted to the microtubule–Hec1 interaction inhibit cancer cell growth through microtubule stabilization. Oncogene. 37(2). 231–240. 18 indexed citations
11.
Bernard, Fred, Jean‐Antoine Lepesant, & Antoine Guichet. (2017). Nucleus positioning within Drosophila egg chamber. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology. 82. 25–33. 12 indexed citations
12.
Bernard, Fred, et al.. (2015). Planar Cell Polarity Breaks the Symmetry of PAR Protein Distribution prior to Mitosis in Drosophila Sensory Organ Precursor Cells. Current Biology. 25(8). 1104–1110. 40 indexed citations
13.
Housden, Benjamin E., Audrey Qiuyan Fu, Alena Krejčı́, et al.. (2013). Transcriptional Dynamics Elicited by a Short Pulse of Notch Activation Involves Feed-Forward Regulation by E(spl)/Hes Genes. PLoS Genetics. 9(1). e1003162–e1003162. 49 indexed citations
14.
Djiane, Alexandre, et al.. (2012). Dissecting the mechanisms of Notch induced hyperplasia. The EMBO Journal. 32(1). 60–71. 59 indexed citations
15.
Housden, Benjamin E., et al.. (2010). The cytolinker Pigs is a direct target and a negative regulator of Notch signalling. Development. 137(6). 913–922. 21 indexed citations
16.
Krejčı́, Alena, et al.. (2009). Direct Response to Notch Activation: Signaling Crosstalk and Incoherent Logic. Science Signaling. 2(55). ra1–ra1. 133 indexed citations
17.
Bernard, Fred, et al.. (2009). Integration of differentiation signals during indirect flight muscle formation by a novel enhancer of Drosophila vestigial gene. Developmental Biology. 332(2). 258–272. 15 indexed citations
18.
Bernard, Fred, Annie Dutriaux, Joël Silber, & Alexis Lalouette. (2006). Notch pathway repression by vestigial is required to promote indirect flight muscle differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster. Developmental Biology. 295(1). 164–177. 31 indexed citations
19.
Parvy, Jean-Philippe, Catherine Blais, Fred Bernard, et al.. (2005). A role for βFTZ-F1 in regulating ecdysteroid titers during post-embryonic development in Drosophila melanogaster. Developmental Biology. 282(1). 84–94. 112 indexed citations
20.
Bernard, Fred, Alexis Lalouette, A. Y. Jeantet, et al.. (2003). Control of apterous by vestigial drives indirect flight muscle development in drosophila. Developmental Biology. 260(2). 391–403. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026