Fraser King

2.7k total citations
129 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Fraser King is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Civil and Structural Engineering and Metals and Alloys. According to data from OpenAlex, Fraser King has authored 129 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 105 papers in Materials Chemistry, 56 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering and 52 papers in Metals and Alloys. Recurrent topics in Fraser King's work include Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (76 papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (52 papers) and Concrete Corrosion and Durability (43 papers). Fraser King is often cited by papers focused on Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition (76 papers), Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals (52 papers) and Concrete Corrosion and Durability (43 papers). Fraser King collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Sweden and United States. Fraser King's co-authors include Christina Lilja, W. Chen, David W. Shoesmith, Michael J. Quinn, Tom Jack, Peter Keech, Z. Qin, L. Werme, R. R. Fessler and Cristiano Padovani and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Corrosion Science and Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

In The Last Decade

Fraser King

124 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fraser King Canada 27 1.6k 915 723 317 253 129 2.0k
Peter Keech Canada 25 1.2k 0.8× 496 0.5× 447 0.6× 221 0.7× 238 0.9× 90 1.7k
Z. Qin Canada 21 1.0k 0.7× 532 0.6× 385 0.5× 167 0.5× 93 0.4× 46 1.2k
Damien Féron France 26 1.2k 0.8× 642 0.7× 451 0.6× 372 1.2× 66 0.3× 71 2.4k
R. Sabot France 31 2.1k 1.3× 1.1k 1.2× 1.0k 1.4× 390 1.2× 63 0.2× 82 2.9k
Didier Crusset France 13 633 0.4× 360 0.4× 314 0.4× 135 0.4× 70 0.3× 46 828
Delphine Neff France 24 1.2k 0.8× 474 0.5× 535 0.7× 145 0.5× 117 0.5× 77 1.8k
M.G. Bailey Canada 14 794 0.5× 343 0.4× 202 0.3× 113 0.4× 337 1.3× 36 1000
Derrek G. Owen Canada 18 951 0.6× 385 0.4× 187 0.3× 212 0.7× 180 0.7× 36 1.3k
Zaidi Embong Malaysia 19 813 0.5× 205 0.2× 294 0.4× 134 0.4× 33 0.1× 87 1.3k
Rolf Gubner Australia 24 821 0.5× 430 0.5× 389 0.5× 246 0.8× 42 0.2× 74 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Fraser King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fraser King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fraser King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fraser King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fraser King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fraser King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fraser King. The network helps show where Fraser King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fraser King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fraser King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fraser King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fraser King. Fraser King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
King, Fraser, et al.. (2024). Review of the Modelling of Corrosion Processes and Lifetime Prediction for HLW/SF Containers—Part 1: Process Models. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(2). 124–199. 7 indexed citations
3.
Muñoz, A.G., Úrsula Alonso, Rizlan Bernier‐Latmani, et al.. (2024). WP15 ConCorD state-of-the-art report (container corrosion under disposal conditions). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 1 indexed citations
4.
King, Fraser, Mehran Behazin, & Peter Keech. (2023). Natural and archaeological analogues for corrosion prediction in nuclear waste systems. Materials and Corrosion. 74(11-12). 1811–1822. 3 indexed citations
5.
Hedin, Allan, Christina Lilja, Fraser King, David W. Shoesmith, & Peter Keech. (2023). Comment on “Penetration of corrosive species into copper exposed to simulated O2-free groundwater by time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS)”. Corrosion Science. 217. 111136–111136.
6.
King, Fraser, et al.. (2023). Treatment of canister corrosion in Posiva's safety case for the operating licence application. Materials and Corrosion. 74(11-12). 1567–1579. 3 indexed citations
7.
Giroud, Niels, Yama Tomonaga, Paul Wersin, et al.. (2018). On the fate of oxygen in a spent fuel emplacement drift in Opalinus Clay. Applied Geochemistry. 97. 270–278. 30 indexed citations
8.
King, Fraser, et al.. (2018). Lifetime Predictions for Nuclear Waste Disposal Containers. CORROSION. 75(3). 309–323. 17 indexed citations
9.
King, Fraser, David S. Hall, & Peter Keech. (2017). Nature of the near-field environment in a deep geological repository and the implications for the corrosion behaviour of the container. Corrosion Engineering Science and Technology The International Journal of Corrosion Processes and Corrosion Control. 52(sup1). 25–30. 63 indexed citations
10.
Qin, Z., James J. Noël, S. Ramamurthy, et al.. (2017). The active/passive conditions for copper corrosion under nuclear waste repository environment. Corrosion Engineering Science and Technology The International Journal of Corrosion Processes and Corrosion Control. 52(sup1). 45–49. 29 indexed citations
11.
Padovani, Cristiano, Fraser King, Christina Lilja, et al.. (2017). The corrosion behaviour of candidate container materials for the disposal of high-level waste and spent fuel – a summary of the state of the art and opportunities for synergies in future R&D. Corrosion Engineering Science and Technology The International Journal of Corrosion Processes and Corrosion Control. 52(sup1). 227–231. 20 indexed citations
12.
King, Fraser, et al.. (2017). Corrosion assessment of canister for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel in crystalline rock in Taiwan. Corrosion Engineering Science and Technology The International Journal of Corrosion Processes and Corrosion Control. 52(sup1). 194–199. 8 indexed citations
13.
King, Fraser. (2010). Stress Corrosion Cracking of Carbon Steel Used Fuel Containers in a Canadian Deep Geological Repository in Sedimentary Rock. 4 indexed citations
15.
King, Fraser, et al.. (2005). The unlikelihood of localized corrosion of nuclear waste packages arising from deliquescent brine formation. JOM. 57(1). 43–48. 6 indexed citations
16.
Cheng, Y. Frank, Lin Yang, & Fraser King. (2000). Analysis of Hydrogen Permeation Through Pipeline Steel in Near-Neutral pH SCC Environments. 3 indexed citations
17.
King, Fraser, Miroslav Kolář, & David W. Shoesmith. (1999). Modelling the Oxidative Dissolution of UO2. MRS Proceedings. 556. 6 indexed citations
18.
King, Fraser, et al.. (1996). Modelling the Effects of Porous and Semi-Permeable Layers on Corrosion Processes. 1–26. 8 indexed citations
20.
King, Fraser. (1995). A natural analogue for the long-term corrosion of copper nuclear waste containers—reanalysis of a study of a bronze cannon. Applied Geochemistry. 10(4). 477–487. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026