Francesco Prota

60 total papers · 792 total citations
26 papers, 394 citations indexed

About

Francesco Prota is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Francesco Prota has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 394 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 12 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 7 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Francesco Prota's work include Regional Development and Policy (7 papers), International Business and FDI (5 papers) and Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (5 papers). Francesco Prota is often cited by papers focused on Regional Development and Policy (7 papers), International Business and FDI (5 papers) and Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (5 papers). Francesco Prota collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Austria and Norway. Francesco Prota's co-authors include Nicola D. Coniglio, Adnan Šerić, Amadou Boly, Vito Amendolagine, Elisa Barbieri, Laura Serlenga, Enrico Materia, Gabriella Guasticchi, Riccardo Di Domenicantonio and Claudio Petti and has published in prestigious journals such as World Development, Economics Letters and Regional Studies.

In The Last Decade

Francesco Prota

24 papers receiving 362 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Francesco Prota 211 123 105 102 70 26 394
Kevin H. Zhang 210 1.0× 139 1.1× 164 1.6× 46 0.5× 76 1.1× 15 377
Milica Uvalić 145 0.7× 192 1.6× 123 1.2× 125 1.2× 66 0.9× 47 446
Richard Kozul‐Wright 176 0.8× 116 0.9× 139 1.3× 124 1.2× 80 1.1× 21 436
Simone Polillo 137 0.6× 73 0.6× 104 1.0× 115 1.1× 105 1.5× 18 419
Pan‐Long Tsai 229 1.1× 119 1.0× 176 1.7× 37 0.4× 94 1.3× 21 369
Benedikt Heid 218 1.0× 131 1.1× 222 2.1× 44 0.4× 69 1.0× 28 370
Randolph Luca Bruno 189 0.9× 119 1.0× 75 0.7× 37 0.4× 32 0.5× 33 336
Adeel Malik 221 1.0× 43 0.3× 165 1.6× 56 0.5× 107 1.5× 19 420
Denis de Crombrugghe 185 0.9× 82 0.7× 71 0.7× 67 0.7× 96 1.4× 18 348
José Antonio Alonso 239 1.1× 38 0.3× 157 1.5× 37 0.4× 98 1.4× 29 405

Countries citing papers authored by Francesco Prota

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Francesco Prota's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Francesco Prota with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Francesco Prota more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Francesco Prota

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Francesco Prota. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Francesco Prota. The network helps show where Francesco Prota may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Francesco Prota

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Francesco Prota. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Francesco Prota based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Francesco Prota. Francesco Prota is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026