Forrest Smith

921 citations
46 papers · 686 · h-index 16

Impact in

  • Toxicology top 1%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
    • Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
  • Pharmacology top 10%
    • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Papers in

Forrest Smith

45 papers receiving 671 citations

Peers

Forrest Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Toxicology 190
  • Pharmacology 134
  • Pharmaceutical Science 41
  • Organic Chemistry 143
  • Biotechnology 42
Replace Yukio Kuroiwa with:
Yukio Kuroiwa Japan
Guillaume Le Baut France
Simona Musella Italy
Richard Czerniak United States
Taha F. S. Ali Egypt
Marco Tutone Italy
Renáta Minorics Hungary
Robert D. Sindelar United States
Hai‐Liang Zhu China
Forrest Smith relative to Yukio Kuroiwa Japan Yukio Kuroiwa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Yukio Kuroiwa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Forrest Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Forrest Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Forrest Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forrest Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Forrest Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Forrest Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Forrest Smith. The network helps show where Forrest Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Forrest Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Forrest Smith Line = papers co-authored together Forrest Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987102
2 202189
3 201642
4 201535
5 202125
6 202023
7 201422
8 201521
9 199120
10 201818
11 201418
12 198717
13 201517
14 201416
15 202115
16 201715
17 201514
18 200914
19 201512
20 201612

About Forrest Smith

Forrest Smith is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Toxicology, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (13 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (11 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Synthesis and Biological Activity (4 papers), Advanced Drug Delivery Systems (4 papers) and Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (190 citations), Pharmacology (134 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (41 citations), Organic Chemistry (143 citations) and Biotechnology (42 citations). Forrest Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Libya. Frequent co-authors include Jack DeRuiter, Toshimitsu Hayashi, Charles R. Clark, Muralikrishnan Dhanasekaran, Sindhu Ramesh, Manoj Govindarajulu, Timothy Moore, Jiansheng Huang, Peter Panizzi and Tarek S. Belal. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Chemistry, Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Journal of Chromatographic Science and Journal of Medicinal Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact