Flavius Schackert

944 total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 652 citations indexed

About

Flavius Schackert is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Flavius Schackert has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 652 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 8 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 1 paper in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Flavius Schackert's work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (4 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (3 papers). Flavius Schackert is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (4 papers) and Mechanical and Optical Resonators (3 papers). Flavius Schackert collaborates with scholars based in United States and France. Flavius Schackert's co-authors include Michel Devoret, Luigi Frunzio, N. Bergeal, Michael Hatridge, Baleegh Abdo, Robert Schoelkopf, Vladimir Manucharyan, D. E. Prober, Michael Metcalfe and S. M. Girvin and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters.

In The Last Decade

Flavius Schackert

8 papers receiving 632 citations

Hit Papers

Phase-preserving amplification near the quantum limit wit... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Flavius Schackert United States 6 594 463 132 70 36 8 652
Luke Burkhart United States 9 587 1.0× 468 1.0× 109 0.8× 79 1.1× 28 0.8× 10 676
K. Geerlings United States 5 485 0.8× 428 0.9× 77 0.6× 78 1.1× 49 1.4× 5 570
E. Ladizinsky United States 11 370 0.6× 396 0.9× 102 0.8× 142 2.0× 30 0.8× 16 573
H. S. Ku United States 10 438 0.7× 363 0.8× 100 0.8× 49 0.7× 13 0.4× 10 499
E. Il’ichev Germany 11 481 0.8× 387 0.8× 54 0.4× 79 1.1× 71 2.0× 26 534
Philipp Kurpiers Switzerland 11 859 1.4× 865 1.9× 114 0.9× 43 0.6× 48 1.3× 15 1.0k
P. G. Kaminsky United States 7 501 0.8× 342 0.7× 113 0.9× 61 0.9× 37 1.0× 11 545
Juha Leppäkangas Germany 13 391 0.7× 282 0.6× 69 0.5× 65 0.9× 39 1.1× 26 430
Antti Vepsäläinen Finland 17 717 1.2× 578 1.2× 87 0.7× 43 0.6× 60 1.7× 20 828
Jochen Braumüller United States 15 589 1.0× 479 1.0× 59 0.4× 55 0.8× 58 1.6× 17 663

Countries citing papers authored by Flavius Schackert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Flavius Schackert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flavius Schackert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flavius Schackert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Flavius Schackert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flavius Schackert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flavius Schackert. The network helps show where Flavius Schackert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Flavius Schackert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Flavius Schackert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Flavius Schackert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Flavius Schackert. Flavius Schackert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Abdo, Baleegh, Katrina Sliwa, Flavius Schackert, et al.. (2013). Full Coherent Frequency Conversion between Two Propagating Microwave Modes. Physical Review Letters. 110(17). 173902–173902. 49 indexed citations
2.
Schackert, Flavius, Ananda Roy, Michael Hatridge, Michel Devoret, & A. Douglas Stone. (2013). Three-Wave Mixing with Three Incoming Waves: Signal-Idler Coherent Attenuation and Gain Enhancement in a Parametric Amplifier. Physical Review Letters. 111(7). 73903–73903. 13 indexed citations
3.
Schackert, Flavius. (2013). A Practical Quantum-Limited Parametric Amplifier Based on the Josephson Ring Modulator. 5 indexed citations
4.
Hatridge, Michael, Shyam Shankar, Mazyar Mirrahimi, et al.. (2013). Quantum Back-Action of an Individual Variable-Strength Measurement. Science. 339(6116). 178–181. 182 indexed citations
5.
Bergeal, N., Flavius Schackert, Luigi Frunzio, & Michel Devoret. (2012). Two-Mode Correlation of Microwave Quantum Noise Generated by Parametric Down-Conversion. Physical Review Letters. 108(12). 123902–123902. 42 indexed citations
6.
Bergeal, N., Flavius Schackert, Luigi Frunzio, D. E. Prober, & Michel Devoret. (2012). Mesoscopic resistor as a self-calibrating quantum noise source. Applied Physics Letters. 100(20). 2 indexed citations
7.
Abdo, Baleegh, Flavius Schackert, Michael Hatridge, Chad Rigetti, & Michel Devoret. (2011). Josephson amplifier for qubit readout. Applied Physics Letters. 99(16). 60 indexed citations
8.
Bergeal, N., Flavius Schackert, Michael Metcalfe, et al.. (2010). Phase-preserving amplification near the quantum limit with a Josephson ring modulator. Nature. 465(7294). 64–68. 299 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026