Flavia Chen

871 total citations
9 papers, 171 citations indexed

About

Flavia Chen is a scholar working on Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Flavia Chen has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 171 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Genetics, 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 3 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Flavia Chen's work include Genomics and Rare Diseases (7 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (5 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers). Flavia Chen is often cited by papers focused on Genomics and Rare Diseases (7 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (5 papers) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers). Flavia Chen collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Poland. Flavia Chen's co-authors include Barbara A. Koenig, Jennifer M. Puck, Aaron J. Goldenberg, John D. Lantos, Erik Parens, Josephine Johnston, Charlotte Young, Julie Harris-Wai, Galen Joseph and Eunice Wan and has published in prestigious journals such as PEDIATRICS, Health Affairs and Human Mutation.

In The Last Decade

Flavia Chen

9 papers receiving 165 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Flavia Chen United States 7 126 64 36 32 23 9 171
Natasha Bonhomme United States 7 98 0.8× 87 1.4× 78 2.2× 54 1.7× 33 1.4× 22 228
Kelly M. East United States 10 177 1.4× 41 0.6× 3 0.1× 63 2.0× 28 1.2× 22 227
Eugènie Dekkers Netherlands 6 49 0.4× 28 0.4× 49 1.4× 5 0.2× 21 0.9× 9 102
Ashraf Samavat Iran 5 43 0.3× 138 2.2× 30 0.8× 13 0.4× 28 1.2× 9 333
Debra Abrams United States 5 92 0.7× 29 0.5× 3 0.1× 38 1.2× 29 1.3× 10 183
Ebony Richardson Australia 8 39 0.3× 42 0.7× 3 0.1× 27 0.8× 59 2.6× 17 169
Patricia Himes United States 9 106 0.8× 73 1.1× 2 0.1× 34 1.1× 16 0.7× 9 213
C. R. Leitch United Kingdom 6 45 0.4× 148 2.3× 3 0.1× 88 2.8× 73 3.2× 6 337
Lauren Westerfield United States 6 103 0.8× 112 1.8× 3 0.1× 8 0.3× 50 2.2× 11 183
Hamid Reza Razzaghian Canada 7 33 0.3× 34 0.5× 2 0.1× 36 1.1× 81 3.5× 9 190

Countries citing papers authored by Flavia Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Flavia Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Flavia Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Flavia Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Flavia Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Flavia Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Flavia Chen. The network helps show where Flavia Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Flavia Chen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Flavia Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Flavia Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Flavia Chen. Flavia Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Oza, Shefali, et al.. (2023). Community-Based Outbreak Investigation And Response: Enhancing Preparedness, Public Health Capacity, And Equity. Health Affairs. 42(3). 349–356. 2 indexed citations
2.
Amendola, Laura M., Tia L. Kauffman, Kathleen F. Mittendorf, et al.. (2022). Lessons learned and recommendations for data coordination in collaborative research: The CSER consortium experience. Human Genetics and Genomics Advances. 3(3). 100120–100120. 6 indexed citations
3.
Ferket, Bart S., Akila Pai, Kathleen F. Mittendorf, et al.. (2022). Cost-effectiveness frameworks for comparing genome and exome sequencing versus conventional diagnostic pathways: A scoping review and recommended methods. Genetics in Medicine. 24(10). 2014–2027. 9 indexed citations
4.
Rego, Shannon, Simon Outram, Flavia Chen, et al.. (2022). Perspectives and preferences regarding genomic secondary findings in underrepresented prenatal and pediatric populations: A mixed-methods approach. Genetics in Medicine. 24(6). 1206–1216. 6 indexed citations
5.
Swanson, Kate, Teresa N. Sparks, Billie R. Lianoglou, et al.. (2021). Preference for secondary findings in prenatal and pediatric exome sequencing. Prenatal Diagnosis. 42(6). 753–761. 13 indexed citations
6.
Milko, Laura V., Flavia Chen, Kee Chan, et al.. (2019). FDA oversight of NSIGHT genomic research: the need for an integrated systems approach to regulation. npj Genomic Medicine. 4(1). 32–32. 6 indexed citations
7.
Johnston, Josephine, John D. Lantos, Aaron J. Goldenberg, et al.. (2018). Sequencing Newborns:A Call for Nuanced Use of Genomic Technologies. The Hastings Center Report. 48(S2). S2–S6. 60 indexed citations
8.
Bassaganyas, Laia, Dedeepya Vaka, Eunice Wan, et al.. (2017). Whole exome and whole genome sequencing with dried blood spot DNA without whole genome amplification. Human Mutation. 39(1). 167–171. 26 indexed citations
9.
Joseph, Galen, Flavia Chen, Julie Harris-Wai, et al.. (2016). Parental Views on Expanded Newborn Screening Using Whole-Genome Sequencing. PEDIATRICS. 137(Supplement). S36–S46. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026