F.J. Decker

1.6k total citations
47 papers, 401 citations indexed

About

F.J. Decker is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, F.J. Decker has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 401 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 24 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 22 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in F.J. Decker's work include Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (30 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (24 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (12 papers). F.J. Decker is often cited by papers focused on Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (30 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (24 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (12 papers). F.J. Decker collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. F.J. Decker's co-authors include T. Maxwell, Yuantao Ding, Zhirong Huang, Alberto Lutman, Sharon Vetter, H. Loos, S. Gilevich, Daniel Ratner, J. Welch and A. Miahnahri and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Optics Express.

In The Last Decade

F.J. Decker

34 papers receiving 375 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F.J. Decker United States 7 219 182 142 120 120 47 401
J. Rosenzweig United States 12 220 1.0× 214 1.2× 77 0.5× 150 1.3× 158 1.3× 45 367
Guoxing Xia United Kingdom 12 224 1.0× 301 1.7× 90 0.6× 167 1.4× 174 1.4× 115 507
K. Floettmann Germany 14 455 2.1× 376 2.1× 118 0.8× 255 2.1× 278 2.3× 51 685
A. van Steenbergen United States 10 263 1.2× 168 0.9× 102 0.7× 175 1.5× 124 1.0× 46 372
Franz-Josef Decker United States 7 250 1.1× 416 2.3× 98 0.7× 187 1.6× 133 1.1× 28 533
M. Labat France 12 451 2.1× 287 1.6× 295 2.1× 258 2.1× 117 1.0× 56 607
K. Jobe United States 11 304 1.4× 110 0.6× 222 1.6× 216 1.8× 131 1.1× 26 489
J. S. Wurtele United States 8 536 2.4× 165 0.9× 163 1.1× 408 3.4× 393 3.3× 30 648
L. Groening Germany 14 381 1.7× 203 1.1× 132 0.9× 140 1.2× 404 3.4× 86 577
Alexandre Loulergue France 9 242 1.1× 146 0.8× 103 0.7× 88 0.7× 115 1.0× 57 314

Countries citing papers authored by F.J. Decker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.J. Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.J. Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.J. Decker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.J. Decker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.J. Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.J. Decker. The network helps show where F.J. Decker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F.J. Decker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F.J. Decker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F.J. Decker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F.J. Decker. F.J. Decker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lutman, Alberto, F.J. Decker, Aliaksei Halavanau, T. Maxwell, & Takahiro Sato. (2022). Characterization of a hard X-ray self-seeding diamond crystal orientation. Optics Express. 30(24). 43655–43655. 1 indexed citations
2.
Halavanau, Aliaksei, et al.. (2019). Very high brightness and power LCLS-II hard X-ray pulses. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation. 26(3). 635–646. 24 indexed citations
3.
Guetg, Marc, Alberto Lutman, Yuantao Ding, et al.. (2018). Generation of High-Power High-Intensity Short X-Ray Free-Electron-Laser Pulses. Physical Review Letters. 120(1). 14801–14801. 34 indexed citations
4.
Marinelli, Agostino, Daniel Ratner, Alberto Lutman, et al.. (2015). High-intensity double-pulse X-ray free-electron laser. Nature Communications. 6(1). 6369–6369. 140 indexed citations
5.
Gessner, Spencer, E. Adli, F.J. Decker, T. Raubenheimer, & Alexander Scheinker. (2013). LONGITUDINAL PHASE SPACE DYNAMICS WITH NOVEL DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES AT FACET. 1 indexed citations
6.
Huang, Chengkun, W. Lu, M. Zhou, et al.. (2007). Hosing Instability in the Blow-Out Regime for Plasma-Wakefield Acceleration. Physical Review Letters. 99(25). 255001–255001. 54 indexed citations
7.
Kirby, Neil, I. Blumenfeld, F.J. Decker, et al.. (2007). Emittance measurements of trapped electrons from a plasma wakefield accelerator. 19. 4183–4185.
8.
O’Connell, C., C. Barnes, F.J. Decker, et al.. (2006). Plasma production via field ionization. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams. 9(10). 30 indexed citations
9.
Marsh, K. A., C. E. Clayton, D. Johnson, et al.. (2006). Beam Matching to a Plasma Wake Field Accelerator using a Ramped Density Profile at the Plasma Boundary. Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference. 2702–2704. 16 indexed citations
10.
O’Connell, C., C. Barnes, F.J. Decker, et al.. (2006). Field Ionization of Neutral Lithium Vapor Using A 28.5 GeV Electron Beam. Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference. 64. 1904–1906. 1 indexed citations
11.
Mastromarino, P., T. B. Humensky, P.L. Anthony, et al.. (2005). Helicity-correlated systematics for SLAC Experiment E158. 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310). 8113. 674–680.
12.
Barnes, C., C. O’Connell, F.J. Decker, et al.. (2004). Improvements for the third generation plasma wakefield experiment E-164 at SLAC. 3. 1530–1532.
13.
Barklow, T., G. R. Bower, F.J. Decker, et al.. (2003). Experimental evidence for beam-beam disruption at the SLC. Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366). 1. 307–309.
14.
Blue, B. E., C. E. Clayton, E. S. Dodd, et al.. (2002). Test of the electron hose instability in the E157 experiment. PACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.01CH37268). 5. 4002–4004. 2 indexed citations
15.
Decker, F.J., Richard Brown, & J.T. Seeman. (2002). Beam size measurements with noninterceptive off-axis screens. 2507–2509. 1 indexed citations
16.
Raimondi, P., F.J. Decker, & Pisin Chen. (2002). Disruption effects on the beam size measurement. Proceedings Particle Accelerator Conference. 5. 2919–2921. 2 indexed citations
17.
Minty, M., R. Akre, F.J. Decker, & J. Turner. (2002). Operation and performance of bunch precompression for increased current transmission at the SLC. Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167). 2. 1569–1571. 1 indexed citations
18.
Decker, F.J., et al.. (1997). SLC Fast Feedback Performance Improvements at Higher Frequencies. 1 indexed citations
19.
Decker, F.J. & J.T. Seeman. (1994). Luminosity polarization correlation in the SLC. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 88(5). 463–86. 1 indexed citations
20.
Bremer, Hartmut, et al.. (1989). Insulation of a hollow beam gun. IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation. 24(6). 955–958. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026