Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Nutrition and Food Literacy: Framing the Challenges to Health Communication
202393 citationsPaula Silva, Rita Araújo et al.Nutrientsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Felisbela Lopes
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Felisbela Lopes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felisbela Lopes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felisbela Lopes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felisbela Lopes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felisbela Lopes. The network helps show where Felisbela Lopes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felisbela Lopes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felisbela Lopes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felisbela Lopes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Felisbela Lopes. Felisbela Lopes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lopes, Felisbela, et al.. (2020). COVID-19: jornalistas assumem orientação dos cidadãos pela primeira vez em Portugal. RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho).1 indexed citations
8.
Lopes, Felisbela. (2016). Da pós-neotelevisão: a reconfiguração do prime-time nos canais generalistas portugueses. RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho). 33–46.
9.
Araújo, Rita & Felisbela Lopes. (2014). A Saúde na imprensa portuguesa: que perfil editorial?. RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho). 10.1 indexed citations
10.
Lopes, Felisbela, et al.. (2013). À procura de uma vibrante esfera pública da saúde através da análise da imprensa portuguesa. RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho). 17–30.2 indexed citations
11.
Lopes, Felisbela, et al.. (2013). O real (ainda) mora aqui? Os convidados e a participação dos espectadores na TV informativa. RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho).1 indexed citations
12.
Lopes, Felisbela, et al.. (2012). A TV portuguesa à procura de cumprir uma promessa de participação. RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho). 6.
Lopes, Felisbela. (2009). Homens públicos, mulheres privadas : a presença da mulher na informação televisiva. Deposito de Investigacion Universidad de Sevilla (University of Seville). 72.
18.
Lopes, Felisbela. (2007). A TV das elites: estudo dos programas de informação semanal dos canais generalistas (1993-2005). RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho). 1–376.1 indexed citations
19.
Lopes, Felisbela & Sara Pereira. (2006). A TV do futebol. 7–131.1 indexed citations
20.
Sousa, Helena, et al.. (2000). A comunicação e os media em Portugal (1995-1999): cronologia e leituras de tendências. RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.