Federico Rebok

411 total citations
9 papers, 123 citations indexed

About

Federico Rebok is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Federico Rebok has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 123 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Federico Rebok's work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Psychology Research and Bibliometrics (2 papers). Federico Rebok is often cited by papers focused on Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Psychology Research and Bibliometrics (2 papers). Federico Rebok collaborates with scholars based in Argentina, United States and Chile. Federico Rebok's co-authors include Federico M. Daray, Sasha M. Rojas, Leandro Nicolás Grendas, Demián Rodante, Ana J. Bridges, Christal L. Badour, Matthew T. Feldner and Courtney E. Dutton and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, Comprehensive Psychiatry and Psychiatric Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Federico Rebok

8 papers receiving 117 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Federico Rebok Argentina	6	105	30	17	15	13	9	123
Sachin Nagendrappa India	6	106 1.0×	46 1.5×	16 0.9×	20 1.3×	13 1.0×	21	168
Brittany Robinson United States	8	110 1.0×	34 1.1×	15 0.9×	19 1.3×	14 1.1×	9	155
Fuad Ismayilov Azerbaijan	5	94 0.9×	40 1.3×	26 1.5×	15 1.0×	9 0.7×	10	129
Molly R. Davies United Kingdom	8	44 0.4×	17 0.6×	14 0.8×	14 0.9×	18 1.4×	15	120
Zeina Mneimneh United States	7	80 0.8×	35 1.2×	8 0.5×	25 1.7×	15 1.2×	11	147
Lana Bojanić United Kingdom	7	90 0.9×	43 1.4×	12 0.7×	22 1.5×	17 1.3×	21	126
Richard L. Frierson United States	8	110 1.0×	31 1.0×	29 1.7×	37 2.5×	9 0.7×	29	156
Beth Paterson United Kingdom	3	82 0.8×	57 1.9×	34 2.0×	21 1.4×	5 0.4×	3	129
Enric J. Novella Spain	6	103 1.0×	31 1.0×	44 2.6×	19 1.3×	10 0.8×	36	180
Owen Stafford Ireland	5	91 0.9×	41 1.4×	9 0.5×	16 1.1×	12 0.9×	6	126

Countries citing papers authored by Federico Rebok

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Federico Rebok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federico Rebok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federico Rebok more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Federico Rebok

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federico Rebok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federico Rebok. The network helps show where Federico Rebok may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Federico Rebok

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Federico Rebok. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Federico Rebok based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Federico Rebok. Federico Rebok is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Daray, Federico M., Sasha M. Rojas, Ana J. Bridges, et al.. (2016). The independent effects of child sexual abuse and impulsivity on lifetime suicide attempts among female patients. Child Abuse & Neglect. 58. 91–98. 37 indexed citations

Daray, Federico M., Leandro Nicolás Grendas, & Federico Rebok. (2016). Cambios en la conceptualización de la conducta suicida a lo largo de la historia: desde la antigüedad hasta el DSM-5. Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas de Córdoba. 73(3). 205–211. 1 indexed citations

Rodante, Demián, Sasha M. Rojas, Matthew T. Feldner, et al.. (2016). Differences between female suicidal patients with family history of suicide attempt and family history of completed suicide. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 70. 25–31. 8 indexed citations

Daray, Federico M., Leandro Nicolás Grendas, & Federico Rebok. (2016). [Changes in the conceptualization of suicidal behavior throughout history: from antiquity to the DSM-5.]. PubMed. 73(3). 205–211.

Daray, Federico M., et al.. (2015). Time Left for Intervention in the Suicidal Process in Borderline Personality Disorder. Archives of Suicide Research. 19(4). 489–499. 5 indexed citations

Rebok, Federico, et al.. (2015). [Patients hospitalized for suicidal ideation and suicide attempt in a Mental Health Hospital: Clinicodemographical features and 6-month follow-up].. PubMed. 25(115). 203–12. 8 indexed citations

Rebok, Federico, et al.. (2014). Systematic review of risk factors for suicide and suicide attempt among psychiatric patients in Latin America and Caribbean.. PubMed. 36(2). 124–33. 52 indexed citations

Rebok, Federico, et al.. (2014). Types of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) in Patients Admitted for Suicide-Related Behavior. Psychiatric Quarterly. 86(1). 49–60. 10 indexed citations

Rebok, Federico, et al.. (2009). [Cutaneous side effects due to psychiatric drugs].. PubMed. 19(82). 348–56. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact