F.B.J. Menting

634 total citations
11 papers, 496 citations indexed

About

F.B.J. Menting is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, F.B.J. Menting has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 496 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Plant Science, 6 papers in Ecology and 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in F.B.J. Menting's work include Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (6 papers), Plant responses to water stress (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). F.B.J. Menting is often cited by papers focused on Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (6 papers), Plant responses to water stress (5 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers). F.B.J. Menting collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and South Africa. F.B.J. Menting's co-authors include Wim H. van der Putten, J. P. M. Lenssen, C.W.P.M. Blom, Thomas Lans, E. Pernilla Brinkman, George A. Kowalchuk, Elmar Veenendaal, T.J.L. van Hintum and W. van Dooijeweert and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, New Phytologist and Oecologia.

In The Last Decade

F.B.J. Menting

11 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F.B.J. Menting Netherlands 9 310 240 192 94 71 11 496
John Duggin Australia 10 203 0.7× 174 0.7× 292 1.5× 92 1.0× 107 1.5× 18 520
J. Gaisler Czechia 13 308 1.0× 202 0.8× 282 1.5× 109 1.2× 37 0.5× 42 593
Tomás E. Díaz Spain 11 284 0.9× 113 0.5× 167 0.9× 153 1.6× 41 0.6× 24 487
Noboru KURAMOTO Japan 11 139 0.4× 88 0.4× 162 0.8× 113 1.2× 52 0.7× 62 379
Jianhou Zhang China 7 121 0.4× 142 0.6× 260 1.4× 116 1.2× 200 2.8× 12 512
Leonid Rasran Germany 9 329 1.1× 396 1.6× 451 2.3× 163 1.7× 80 1.1× 16 698
Calvin E. Meier United States 6 200 0.6× 126 0.5× 229 1.2× 50 0.5× 146 2.1× 10 490
Marco Landi Italy 14 242 0.8× 166 0.7× 215 1.1× 171 1.8× 44 0.6× 41 481
J. R. B. Tallowin Netherlands 7 296 1.0× 341 1.4× 380 2.0× 127 1.4× 57 0.8× 36 643
Laurel Pfeifer‐Meister United States 15 114 0.4× 245 1.0× 181 0.9× 121 1.3× 118 1.7× 25 486

Countries citing papers authored by F.B.J. Menting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.B.J. Menting's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.B.J. Menting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.B.J. Menting more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.B.J. Menting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.B.J. Menting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.B.J. Menting. The network helps show where F.B.J. Menting may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F.B.J. Menting

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F.B.J. Menting. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F.B.J. Menting based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F.B.J. Menting. F.B.J. Menting is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Hintum, T.J.L. van, et al.. (2011). Quality indicators for passport data in ex situ genebanks. Plant Genetic Resources. 9(3). 478–485. 9 indexed citations
2.
Dooijeweert, W. van & F.B.J. Menting. (2010). Access to plant genetic resources information. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 515–545. 2 indexed citations
3.
Dooijeweert, W. van & F.B.J. Menting. (2008). Improving the quality of passport data of a genebank collection: approaches at CGN. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 2008(153). 20–27. 2 indexed citations
4.
Putten, Wim H. van der, et al.. (2007). SOIL FEEDBACK OF EXOTIC SAVANNA GRASS RELATES TO PATHOGEN ABSENCE AND MYCORRHIZAL SELECTIVITY. Ecology. 88(4). 978–988. 95 indexed citations
6.
Lenssen, J. P. M., F.B.J. Menting, & Wim H. van der Putten. (2003). Plant responses to simultaneous stress of waterlogging and shade: amplified or hierarchical effects?. New Phytologist. 157(2). 281–290. 61 indexed citations
7.
Lenssen, J. P. M., F.B.J. Menting, & Wim H. van der Putten. (2003). Do competition and selective herbivory cause replacement of Phragmites australis by tall forbs?. Aquatic Botany. 78(3). 217–232. 13 indexed citations
8.
Lenssen, J. P. M., F.B.J. Menting, Wim H. van der Putten, & C.W.P.M. Blom. (2000). Variation in species composition and species richness within Phragmites australis dominated riparian zones. Plant Ecology. 147(1). 137–146. 31 indexed citations
9.
Lenssen, J. P. M., F.B.J. Menting, Wim H. van der Putten, & C.W.P.M. Blom. (2000). Vegetative reproduction by species with different adaptations to shallow‐flooded habitats. New Phytologist. 145(1). 61–70. 30 indexed citations
10.
Lenssen, J. P. M., et al.. (1999). Control of Plant Species Richness and Zonation of Functional Groups along a Freshwater Flooding Gradient. Oikos. 86(3). 523–523. 112 indexed citations
11.
Lenssen, J. P. M., F.B.J. Menting, Wim H. van der Putten, & C.W.P.M. Blom. (1999). Effects of sediment type and water level on biomass production of wetland plant species. Aquatic Botany. 64(2). 151–165. 60 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026