Fang Gai

736 total citations
10 papers, 611 citations indexed

About

Fang Gai is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Microbiology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Fang Gai has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 611 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Infectious Diseases, 7 papers in Microbiology and 5 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Fang Gai's work include HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (7 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers). Fang Gai is often cited by papers focused on HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (7 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (5 papers). Fang Gai collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and South Africa. Fang Gai's co-authors include Lisa Maslankowski, Wafaa El‐Sadr, Kenneth H. Mayer, Kathleen M. Morrow, James F. Rooney, Joanne E. Mantell, Jessica Justman, Alex Carballo‐Diéguez, Rochelle K. Rosen and Susie Hoffman and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, AIDS and JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes.

In The Last Decade

Fang Gai

10 papers receiving 590 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fang Gai United States 10 391 358 194 190 162 10 611
Lisa Maslankowski United States 10 479 1.2× 484 1.4× 311 1.6× 208 1.1× 231 1.4× 13 777
Sumen Govender South Africa 3 301 0.8× 234 0.7× 204 1.1× 108 0.6× 143 0.9× 4 450
Chuong Dinh United States 12 284 0.7× 118 0.3× 34 0.2× 184 1.0× 110 0.7× 32 376
Laura Noël‐Romas Canada 11 182 0.5× 245 0.7× 77 0.4× 98 0.5× 153 0.9× 21 519
Adesina Adeiga Nigeria 7 237 0.6× 165 0.5× 107 0.6× 81 0.4× 147 0.9× 13 371
Michelle Perner Canada 7 147 0.4× 186 0.5× 64 0.3× 76 0.4× 109 0.7× 8 360
Muzala Kapina Zambia 7 175 0.4× 107 0.3× 102 0.5× 62 0.3× 78 0.5× 18 305
Victoria Mobley United States 13 224 0.6× 170 0.5× 97 0.5× 68 0.4× 223 1.4× 34 509
Timothy M. Alcorn United States 13 542 1.4× 146 0.4× 41 0.2× 452 2.4× 173 1.1× 16 851
Alexander Hoare Australia 11 347 0.9× 101 0.3× 85 0.4× 120 0.6× 316 2.0× 18 523

Countries citing papers authored by Fang Gai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fang Gai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fang Gai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fang Gai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fang Gai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fang Gai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fang Gai. The network helps show where Fang Gai may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fang Gai

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fang Gai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fang Gai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fang Gai. Fang Gai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Li, Tao, et al.. (2020). PASE: PostgreSQL Ultra-High-Dimensional Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search Extension. 2241–2253. 24 indexed citations
2.
Rohan, Lisa C., Bernard J. Moncla, Ratiya Pamela Kunjara Na Ayudhya, et al.. (2010). In Vitro and Ex Vivo Testing of Tenofovir Shows It Is Effective As an HIV-1 Microbicide. PLoS ONE. 5(2). e9310–e9310. 154 indexed citations
3.
Hoffman, Susie, et al.. (2009). Covert Use, Vaginal Lubrication, and Sexual Pleasure: A Qualitative Study of Urban U.S. Women in a Vaginal Microbicide Clinical Trial. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 39(3). 748–760. 42 indexed citations
4.
Rosen, Rochelle K., Kathleen M. Morrow, Alex Carballo‐Diéguez, et al.. (2008). Acceptability of Tenofovir Gel as a Vaginal Microbicide Among Women in a Phase I Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Women s Health. 17(3). 383–392. 66 indexed citations
5.
Carballo‐Diéguez, Alex, Iván C. Balán, Kathleen M. Morrow, et al.. (2007). Acceptability of tenofovir gel as a vaginal microbicide by US male participants in a Phase I clinical trial (HPTN 050). AIDS Care. 19(8). 1026–1031. 31 indexed citations
6.
Joshi, Smita, et al.. (2007). Acceptability of PRO2000 Vaginal Gel among HIV un-infected Women in Pune, India. AIDS Care. 19(6). 817–821. 34 indexed citations
7.
Mayer, Kenneth H., Lisa Maslankowski, Fang Gai, et al.. (2006). Safety and tolerability of tenofovir vaginal gel in abstinent and sexually active HIV-infected and uninfected women. AIDS. 20(4). 543–551. 143 indexed citations
8.
El‐Sadr, Wafaa, Kenneth H. Mayer, Lisa Maslankowski, et al.. (2006). Safety and acceptability of cellulose sulfate as a vaginal microbicide in HIV-infected women. AIDS. 20(8). 1109–1116. 65 indexed citations
9.
Joshi, Smita, et al.. (2006). Phase I safety study of 0.5% PRO 2000 vaginal Gel among HIV un-infected women in Pune, India.. AIDS Research and Therapy. 3(1). 4–4. 17 indexed citations
10.
Tabet, Stephen R., Marianne M. Callahan, Christine Mauck, et al.. (2003). Safety and Acceptability of Penile Application of 2 Candidate Topical Microbicides: BufferGel and PRO 2000 Gel. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 33(4). 476–483. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026