F. Rouse

4.4k total citations
13 papers, 50 citations indexed

About

F. Rouse is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Rouse has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 50 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 5 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 3 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in F. Rouse's work include Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (6 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (4 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (2 papers). F. Rouse is often cited by papers focused on Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (6 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (4 papers) and Experimental Learning in Engineering (2 papers). F. Rouse collaborates with scholars based in United States. F. Rouse's co-authors include Bernard Lo, T. Himel, L. Hendrickson, C. von Zanthier, D. Briggs, K. Krauter, M. King, M. E. Levi, J. Nash and N. Phinney and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

In The Last Decade

F. Rouse

12 papers receiving 45 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. Rouse United States 4 18 17 12 10 8 13 50
J. Farley United States 2 5 0.3× 5 0.3× 12 1.0× 4 0.4× 3 0.4× 3 39
H. Duran Yıldız Türkiye 4 3 0.2× 7 0.4× 9 0.8× 2 0.2× 33 4.1× 18 82
D. Dawson Canada 4 14 0.8× 3 0.2× 6 0.5× 3 0.3× 4 109
R. Mumford United States 3 5 0.3× 6 0.4× 5 0.4× 1 0.1× 11 1.4× 6 24
Om Prakash Yadav United States 4 11 0.6× 34 2.0× 3 0.3× 1 0.1× 14 87
I. Dawson United Kingdom 4 6 0.3× 2 0.1× 21 1.8× 18 1.8× 60 7.5× 9 89
Paul Nedelea Romania 5 10 0.6× 5 0.3× 2 0.2× 3 0.3× 15 60
Conceição Santiago Portugal 4 22 1.2× 12 0.7× 11 1.1× 14 57
Xiaobin Feng China 3 8 0.4× 8 0.5× 6 0.5× 12 38
Ross Findlay Germany 4 18 1.0× 13 0.8× 17 68

Countries citing papers authored by F. Rouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Rouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Rouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Rouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Rouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Rouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Rouse. The network helps show where F. Rouse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Rouse

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Rouse. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Rouse based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Rouse. F. Rouse is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Kent, J., M. King, C. von Zanthier, et al.. (2003). Precision measurements of the SLC beam energy. 1550–1552. 1 indexed citations
2.
Levi, M. E., F. Rouse, J. M. Butler, et al.. (2003). Precision synchrotron radiation detectors. 441. 1544–1546. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rouse, F., et al.. (2002). General, database-driven fast-feedback system for the Stanford Linear Collider. 1419–1421. 4 indexed citations
5.
Himel, T., et al.. (2002). Use of digital control theory state space formalism for feedback at SLC. 1451–1453. 4 indexed citations
6.
Rouse, F., et al.. (2002). Design of VAX software for a generalized feedback system. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1416–1418. 1 indexed citations
7.
Rouse, F., et al.. (1992). A database driven fast feedback system for the Stanford linear collider. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 316(2-3). 343–350. 5 indexed citations
8.
Lo, Bernard, et al.. (1990). Family Decision Making on Trial. New England Journal of Medicine. 322(17). 1228–1232. 28 indexed citations
9.
Rouse, F., D. Briggs, J.J. Gómez, C. von Zanthier, & J. Kent. (1990). The electronics and data acquisition system for the wire imaging synchrotron radiation detector at the SLC. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 37(3). 1182–1185. 1 indexed citations
10.
Zanthier, C. von, J.J. Gómez-Cadenas, J. Kent, et al.. (1990). Initial performance of the Wire Imaging Synchrotron Radiation Detector. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 37(2). 44–47. 1 indexed citations
11.
Briggs, D., et al.. (1989). A CDU-based data acquisition system for the energy spectrometer at the Standard Linear Collider. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 36(1). 709–712. 2 indexed citations
12.
Deevey, Edward S., et al.. (1965). RDC volume 7 Cover and Front matter. Radiocarbon. 7. f1–f4. 1 indexed citations
13.
Deevey, Edward S., et al.. (1964). RDC volume 6 Cover and Front matter. Radiocarbon. 6. f1–f5. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026