Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Immunogenic death of colon cancer cells treated with oxaliplatin
2009917 citationsLudovic Barault, Valérie Jooste et al.profile →
Improved management of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic patients using early thoracic computed tomographic scan and surgery.
1997514 citationsD. Caillot, Olivier Casasnovas et al.Journal of Clinical Oncologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of F Piard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F Piard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F Piard more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F Piard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F Piard. The network helps show where F Piard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F Piard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F Piard.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F Piard based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F Piard. F Piard is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lièvre, Astrid, Anne‐Marie Bouvier, Caroline Chapusot, et al.. (2006). Mitochondrial DNA copy number in colorectal cancer cells is dependant of nuclear microsatellite instability status. Cancer Research. 66. 214–215.2 indexed citations
Rassiat, Emmanuel, Christophe Michiels, F Piard, & Jean Faivre. (2001). [Lymphocytic colitis in a women with Biermer's disease treated with Cirkan].. PubMed. 30(19). 970–970.5 indexed citations
15.
Monges, G. & F Piard. (1998). Recommandations pour la rédaction des comptes-rendus anatomo-pathologiques des cancers coliques. Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique. 22.3 indexed citations
16.
Monges, G. & F Piard. (1998). [Recommendations for pathologic reporting of resected colonic neoplasms].. PubMed. 22(3 Suppl). S126–30.2 indexed citations
17.
Caillot, D., Olivier Casasnovas, Alain Bernard, et al.. (1997). Improved management of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in neutropenic patients using early thoracic computed tomographic scan and surgery.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 15(1). 139–147.514 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.