F. Méot

550 total citations
57 papers, 195 citations indexed

About

F. Méot is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Aerospace Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Méot has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 195 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 49 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 32 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 22 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in F. Méot's work include Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (46 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (31 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (19 papers). F. Méot is often cited by papers focused on Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (46 papers), Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (31 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (19 papers). F. Méot collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Switzerland. F. Méot's co-authors include A. Hofmann, T. Aniel, J. Pasternak, G. Ferioli, B. Autin, Ph. Moretto, Michael J. Merchant, E. D'Amico, Laurent Sérani and J. Mann and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Computational Physics and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

F. Méot

43 papers receiving 182 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. Méot United States 7 149 98 68 51 43 57 195
E. Bravin Switzerland 7 155 1.0× 110 1.1× 72 1.1× 61 1.2× 109 2.5× 83 240
K. Smolenski United States 9 159 1.1× 93 0.9× 55 0.8× 103 2.0× 27 0.6× 32 209
Kazami Yamamoto Japan 8 167 1.1× 165 1.7× 50 0.7× 94 1.8× 32 0.7× 64 234
A. Grippo United States 5 216 1.4× 131 1.3× 66 1.0× 69 1.4× 45 1.0× 8 262
S. Doebert Switzerland 7 112 0.8× 82 0.8× 32 0.5× 24 0.5× 61 1.4× 49 156
A.D. Yeremian United States 8 172 1.2× 105 1.1× 30 0.4× 97 1.9× 72 1.7× 31 255
E. Benedetto Switzerland 7 118 0.8× 114 1.2× 21 0.3× 91 1.8× 37 0.9× 62 171
Finn O'Shea United States 9 137 0.9× 73 0.7× 64 0.9× 34 0.7× 65 1.5× 23 198
I. Polák Italy 7 139 0.9× 96 1.0× 57 0.8× 82 1.6× 40 0.9× 51 209
R. Wells United States 8 140 0.9× 112 1.1× 51 0.8× 31 0.6× 35 0.8× 44 174

Countries citing papers authored by F. Méot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Méot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Méot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Méot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Méot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Méot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Méot. The network helps show where F. Méot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Méot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Méot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Méot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Méot. F. Méot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Huang, H., et al.. (2023). Commissioning results of the BNL Alternating Gradient Synchrotron booster AC dipole. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1059. 168999–168999.
2.
Méot, F., et al.. (2023). Polarized Beam Dynamics and Instrumentation in Particle Accelerators. 1 indexed citations
3.
Méot, F., et al.. (2022). RHIC optics and spin dynamics with snakes and rotators. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams. 25(12).
4.
Méot, F., et al.. (2022). Modeling and implementation of vertical excursion FFA in the Zgoubi ray-tracing code. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 1047. 167829–167829. 1 indexed citations
5.
Berg, J. Scott, K. Deitrick, K. A. Drees, et al.. (2021). Large Radial Shifts in the EIC Hadron Storage Ring. JACOW. 1443–1446.
6.
Huang, H., J. Kewisch, A. Marušić, et al.. (2019). Measurement of the Spin Tune Using the Coherent Spin Motion of Polarized Protons in a Storage Ring. Physical Review Letters. 122(20). 204803–204803. 3 indexed citations
7.
Blaskiewicz, M., F. Méot, C. Montag, et al.. (2018). Spin resonance free electron ring injector. Physical Review Accelerators and Beams. 21(11). 5 indexed citations
8.
Méot, F.. (2015). Simulation of radiation damping in rings, using stepwise ray-tracing methods. Journal of Instrumentation. 10(6). T06006–T06006.
9.
Méot, F., et al.. (2014). High power from fixed-field rings in the ads-reactor application. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 111. 20–23. 1 indexed citations
10.
Méot, F.. (2014). The ray-tracing code Zgoubi – Status. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 767. 112–125. 15 indexed citations
11.
Ahrens, L., et al.. (2014). Energy Calibration and Tune Jumps Efficiency in the pp AGS. JACOW. 3095–3097.
12.
Tsoupas, N., H. Huang, W. W. MacKay, et al.. (2013). BNL alternating gradient synchrotron with four helical magnets to minimize the losses of the polarized proton beam. Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams. 16(4). 1 indexed citations
13.
Berg, J. Scott, et al.. (2010). Recent developments on the EMMA on-line commissioning software. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 4325–4327. 3 indexed citations
14.
Pasternak, J., et al.. (2007). 3-D magnetic calculation methods for spiral scaling FFAG magnet design. 1401–1403. 1 indexed citations
15.
Incerti, S., R. W. Smith, Michael J. Merchant, et al.. (2005). A comparison of ray-tracing software for the design of quadrupole microbeam systems. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 231(1-4). 76–85. 18 indexed citations
16.
Lambert, G., B. Carré, Marie-Emmanuelle Couprie, et al.. (2005). The ARC-EN-CIEL FEL proposal. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5917. 591703–591703. 3 indexed citations
17.
Autin, B., et al.. (2003). Horn Vibration Acoustic Measurements. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
18.
Méot, F. & T. Aniel. (1996). Principles of the non-linear tuning of beam expanders. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 379(2). 196–205. 16 indexed citations
19.
Méot, F.. (1994). Generalization of the Zgoubi method for ray-tracing to include electric fields. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 340(3). 594–604. 4 indexed citations
20.
Bosser, J., R. Coı̈sson, E. D'Amico, et al.. (1983). Single Bunch Profile Measurement Using Synchrotron Light from an Undulator. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 30(4). 2164–2166. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026