F. Ll. Griffith

1.6k total citations
5 papers, 18 citations indexed

About

F. Ll. Griffith is a scholar working on Archeology, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Ll. Griffith has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 18 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Archeology, 1 paper in Infectious Diseases and 1 paper in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in F. Ll. Griffith's work include Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (3 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (1 paper) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper). F. Ll. Griffith is often cited by papers focused on Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (3 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (1 paper) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper). F. Ll. Griffith collaborates with scholars based in . F. Ll. Griffith's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

In The Last Decade

F. Ll. Griffith

5 papers receiving 14 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
F. Ll. Griffith	3	5	4	3	3	2	5	18
Dale Sizer	2	4 0.8×		2 0.7×			2	5
Barbara G. Schutt United States	3	2 0.4×		2 0.7×		1 0.5×	10	14
A. Stanleẏ Griffith United Kingdom	2	2 0.4×		2 0.7×			2	6
Luca Van Der Kraan Netherlands	2	3 0.6×					5	4
Werner Schultz United States	2	1 0.2×	5 1.3×	5 1.7×	1 0.3×	1 0.5×	7	13
Jean C. Tolhurst Australia	2	2 0.4×		4 1.3×			3	5
K. Murphy United States	2	2 0.4×		3 1.0×			2	7
Stephan Dressler United States	3	4 0.8×		2 0.7×		1 0.5×	5	13
William Addison United Kingdom	2	3 0.6×		3 1.0×			2	4
S. Destrac France	1	4 0.8×		3 1.0×			2	5

Countries citing papers authored by F. Ll. Griffith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Ll. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Ll. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Ll. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Ll. Griffith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Ll. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Ll. Griffith. The network helps show where F. Ll. Griffith may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Griffith, F. Ll.. (2010). A Collection of Hieroglyphs: A Contribution to the History of Egyptian Writing. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew). 4 indexed citations

2.

Griffith, F. Ll.. (1981). The Significance of Pneumococcal Types. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 3(2). 372–395. 7 indexed citations

3.

Griffith, F. Ll., et al.. (1974). The Leyden papyrus : an egyptian magical book. 5 indexed citations

4.

Griffith, F. Ll., et al.. (1955). History and archaeology of the site. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

5.

Griffith, F. Ll.. (1951). The Decipherment of the Hieroglyphs. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 37. 38–38. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact