Countries citing papers authored by F. L. Scarpace
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of F. L. Scarpace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. L. Scarpace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. L. Scarpace more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. L. Scarpace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. L. Scarpace. The network helps show where F. L. Scarpace may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. L. Scarpace
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. L. Scarpace.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. L. Scarpace based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F. L. Scarpace. F. L. Scarpace is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pope, Paul A. & F. L. Scarpace. (2000). INITIAL TESTING OF A METHOD TO GEOGRAPHICALLY REGISTER AIRBORNE SCANNER IMAGERY THROUGH PARAMETRIC MODELING WITH IMAGE-TO-IMAGE MATCHING.1 indexed citations
3.
Scarpace, F. L., et al.. (1981). Wetland mapping from digitized aerial photography. [Sheboygen Marsh, Sheboygen County, Wisconsin.1 indexed citations
4.
Scarpace, F. L., et al.. (1981). Wetland mapping from digitized aerial photography. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).17 indexed citations
5.
Scarpace, F. L., et al.. (1981). Improving streamflow estimates through the use of LANDSAT. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).2 indexed citations
6.
Scarpace, F. L., et al.. (1980). Trophic classification of Tennessee Valley area reservoirs derived from LANDSAT multispectral scanner data. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).3 indexed citations
7.
Scarpace, F. L., et al.. (1979). Landsat analysis of lake quality. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 45.31 indexed citations
8.
Scarpace, F. L., et al.. (1979). Multidate Landsat lake quality monitoring program. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 45.
9.
Scarpace, F. L., et al.. (1978). A method of determining spectral analytical dye densities. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 44. 1293–1301.1 indexed citations
10.
Scarpace, F. L.. (1978). Densitometry on multi-emulsion imagery. 44. 1279–1292.7 indexed citations
11.
Scarpace, F. L., et al.. (1977). Thermal plumes along the Wisconsin shore of Lake Michigan. Transactions of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters.1 indexed citations
12.
Wolf, Patrick, et al.. (1975). AN IMPROVED METHOD OF DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 41(8).52 indexed citations
13.
Lillesand, T. M., et al.. (1975). WATER QUALITY IN MIXING ZONES. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 41(3).4 indexed citations
14.
Scarpace, F. L., et al.. (1974). Scanning thermal plumes. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 41.7 indexed citations
Lillesand, T. M., et al.. (1974). Photographic quantification of water quality in mixing zones. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).2 indexed citations
Green, T.C., et al.. (1972). Point Beach thermal plume. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.