F. Jaulmes

1.4k total citations
22 papers, 109 citations indexed

About

F. Jaulmes is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Jaulmes has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 109 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 10 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in F. Jaulmes's work include Magnetic confinement fusion research (20 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (8 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (8 papers). F. Jaulmes is often cited by papers focused on Magnetic confinement fusion research (20 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (8 papers) and Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (8 papers). F. Jaulmes collaborates with scholars based in Czechia, Germany and Denmark. F. Jaulmes's co-authors include E. Westerhof, M. Imríšek, H.J. de Blank, R. Pánek, M. Salewski, M. Komm, A. S. Jacobsen, S. K. Nielsen, V. Weinzettl and B. Geiger and has published in prestigious journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Nuclear Fusion and Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion.

In The Last Decade

F. Jaulmes

17 papers receiving 101 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. Jaulmes Czechia 7 89 39 28 26 21 22 109
A. Jansen van Vuuren Germany 7 120 1.3× 32 0.8× 60 2.1× 24 0.9× 29 1.4× 21 135
P. Zs. Pölöskei Germany 7 115 1.3× 28 0.7× 47 1.7× 27 1.0× 22 1.0× 23 141
J. F. Chang China 7 95 1.1× 48 1.2× 40 1.4× 17 0.7× 18 0.9× 12 108
P. Traverso United States 5 69 0.8× 20 0.5× 32 1.1× 14 0.5× 16 0.8× 13 79
М. М. Соколов Russia 7 115 1.3× 42 1.1× 24 0.9× 68 2.6× 27 1.3× 20 170
B. Tilia Italy 8 96 1.1× 23 0.6× 19 0.7× 24 0.9× 23 1.1× 15 135
K.A. Jadeja India 7 125 1.4× 29 0.7× 53 1.9× 32 1.2× 19 0.9× 45 146
G. Gervasini Italy 8 87 1.0× 19 0.5× 37 1.3× 49 1.9× 13 0.6× 22 137
O. Jones United Kingdom 8 178 2.0× 44 1.1× 80 2.9× 33 1.3× 18 0.9× 10 186
R. Koenig Germany 6 121 1.4× 21 0.5× 33 1.2× 27 1.0× 26 1.2× 19 142

Countries citing papers authored by F. Jaulmes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Jaulmes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Jaulmes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Jaulmes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Jaulmes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Jaulmes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Jaulmes. The network helps show where F. Jaulmes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Jaulmes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Jaulmes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Jaulmes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Jaulmes. F. Jaulmes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bogár, O., F. Jaulmes, M. Komm, et al.. (2025). Feasibility of electron cyclotron resonance heating for high-field and high-density tokamak COMPASS Upgrade. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 67(2). 25030–25030.
2.
Ficker, O., M. Komm, F. Jaulmes, et al.. (2025). 80keV 1 MW NBI on COMPASS tokamak: the results and operational experience. Fusion Engineering and Design. 216. 115078–115078.
3.
Dejarnac, R., M. Peterka, J. Havlíček, et al.. (2025). Physics drivers for the plasma-facing component design of the COMPASS-U tokamak. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 67(6). 65030–65030.
4.
Moseev, D., F. Jaulmes, Yiqiu Dong, et al.. (2024). Orbit tomography in constants-of-motion phase-space. Nuclear Fusion. 64(7). 76018–76018. 10 indexed citations
5.
Moseev, D., F. Jaulmes, J. Eriksson, et al.. (2024). Diagnostic weight functions in constants-of-motion phase-space. Nuclear Fusion. 64(3). 36007–36007. 11 indexed citations
6.
Horáček, J., et al.. (2024). Scaling of HeatLMD-simulated impurity outflux from COMPASS-U liquid metal divertor. Nuclear Fusion. 65(1). 16014–16014. 2 indexed citations
7.
Gérardin, J., R. Dejarnac, M. Imríšek, et al.. (2023). Front face shaping of the inner wall tiles in the COMPASS Upgrade tokamak. Fusion Engineering and Design. 194. 113731–113731. 1 indexed citations
8.
Komm, M., Jiřı́ Adámek, P. Bílková, et al.. (2023). Experimental evidence of very short power decay lengths in H-mode discharges in the COMPASS tokamak. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 66(1). 15013–15013. 4 indexed citations
9.
Jaulmes, F., et al.. (2022). Numerical modelling for beam duct heat loads calculations and application to the new 1 MW neutral beam injector in the COMPASS tokamak. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 64(12). 125001–125001. 3 indexed citations
10.
Chernyshova, M., K. Malinowski, S. Jabłoński, et al.. (2022). 2D GEM-based SXR imaging diagnostics for plasma radiation: Preliminary design and simulations. Nuclear Materials and Energy. 33. 101306–101306. 1 indexed citations
11.
Jaulmes, F., O. Ficker, V. Weinzettl, et al.. (2022). Modelling of Neutron Markers for the COMPASS Upgrade Tokamak and Generation of Synthetic Neutron Spectra. Journal of Fusion Energy. 41(2). 3 indexed citations
12.
Ficker, O., O. Grover, F. Jaulmes, et al.. (2021). Study of stability and rotation of a chain of saturated, freely-rotating magnetic islands in tokamaks. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 63(7). 74004–74004.
13.
Tomeš, M., M. Carr, A. Meakins, et al.. (2021). Thomson scattering synthetic diagnostic module for the Cherab framework. Review of Scientific Instruments. 92(5). 53532–53532. 1 indexed citations
14.
Havlíček, J., V. Yanovskiy, M. Imríšek, et al.. (2021). Electromagnetic model for finite element analyses of plasma disruption events used in the design phase of the COMPASS-U tokamak. Fusion Engineering and Design. 167. 112369–112369. 5 indexed citations
15.
Tomeš, M., M. Carr, A. Meakins, et al.. (2021). Feasibility study and CXRS synthetic diagnostic model for COMPASS upgrade based on Cherab and Raysect framework. Fusion Engineering and Design. 170. 112498–112498. 3 indexed citations
16.
Jardin, A., D. Mazon, F. Jaulmes, et al.. (2020). Investigations of the impact of heating schemes and poloidal asymmetries on the heavy impurity transport in AUG and TCV. 1 indexed citations
17.
Naydenkova, D., J. Zając, F. Žáček, et al.. (2019). Study for the microwave interferometer for high densities plasmas on COMPASS-U tokamak. Fusion Engineering and Design. 146. 1858–1862. 7 indexed citations
18.
Jaulmes, F., B. Geiger, T. Odstrčil, et al.. (2016). Numerical and experimental study of the redistribution of energetic and impurity ions by sawteeth in ASDEX Upgrade. Nuclear Fusion. 56(11). 112012–112012. 11 indexed citations
19.
Rasmussen, J., S. K. Nielsen, M. Stejner, et al.. (2016). Collective Thomson scattering measurements of fast-ion transport due to sawtooth crashes in ASDEX Upgrade. Nuclear Fusion. 56(11). 112014–112014. 19 indexed citations
20.
Jaulmes, F., E. Westerhof, & H.J. de Blank. (2014). Redistribution of fast ions during sawtooth reconnection. Nuclear Fusion. 54(10). 104013–104013. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Jansen van Vuuren Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. Zs. Pölöskei Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. F. Chang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. Traverso Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by М. М. Соколов Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. Tilia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K.A. Jadeja Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. Gervasini Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by O. Jones Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Koenig
Rankless by CCL
2026